[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15838001#comment-15838001
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1705:
-
I think you need to be a committer in Logging Services to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837826#comment-15837826
]
Raman Gupta commented on LOG4J2-1705:
-
{quote}
The new Git repo is here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15665526#comment-15665526
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1705:
--
The new Git repo is here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15665420#comment-15665420
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1705:
--
I asked INFRA for a new repo with [INFRA-12861].
> Kotlin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15664805#comment-15664805
]
Raman Gupta commented on LOG4J2-1705:
-
Pending:
* tests
* location-aware logging
> Kotlin wrapper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15664796#comment-15664796
]
Raman Gupta commented on LOG4J2-1705:
-
Thanks, removed!
> Kotlin wrapper for Log4j 2 API
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15664775#comment-15664775
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1705:
-
It doesn't look like you actually need log4j-core as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15664726#comment-15664726
]
Raman Gupta commented on LOG4J2-1705:
-
Work in progress @
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15660626#comment-15660626
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1705:
--
Sure, go for it.
This will be in a new repository and
