[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15326164#comment-15326164
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-696:
Assigning to me since it doesn't appear Gary plans on fixing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14060732#comment-14060732
]
phil wray commented on LOG4J2-696:
--
thanks Gary - looks good, even got the pattern name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14053631#comment-14053631
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-696:
-
We might not be able to use
An int flag could make sense, though an enum would work, too. Darn API
improvements that can't be done in the JDK!
On 7 July 2014 08:08, Gary Gregory (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14053792#comment-14053792
]
phil wray commented on LOG4J2-696:
--
Int flag sounds like a better option. Doubt its a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14053841#comment-14053841
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-696:
-
I committed a version that allows a String[] of