Curt Arnold wrote:
Was your performance comparison between the AsyncAppender in log4j
1.2.14 or AsyncAppender from earlier log4j's?
Hi Curt,
I have used 1.2.14 for my comparisons. You will be able to run the test
yourself.
> Since you mentioned that
you discard events in peak load, you
On Jun 8, 2007, at 3:28 AM, Ortwin Glück wrote:
Hi,
I have implemented an asynchronous appender that greatly reduces
synchronization. It contains not a single synchronized statement,
relies on naturally thread-safe operations and just uses two
classes from the java.util.concurrent packag
Hi,
I have implemented an asynchronous appender that greatly reduces
synchronization. It contains not a single synchronized statement, relies
on naturally thread-safe operations and just uses two classes from the
java.util.concurrent package. Still it is completely thread-safe. I am
using thi
