IO (input/output) is a verb (or at least some kind of action).
That said, regardless of whether the noun vs verb argument makes any sense I
still don't think renaming is necessary.
Raph
On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> I don't buy the noun vs. verb argument. W
Hi Ralph,
I don't buy the noun vs. verb argument. What about IOException and
SQLException? By that argument we'd have SQLingExcption and IOingException
;) There are plenty of Exception and Exception.
IllegalStateException is another good one, it denotes state, not that you
are doing something. Bot
I don't really like "Log4jException". Log4j is a noun while Logging is a verb -
it is not meant to imply an exception that applies to all of org.apache.logging
but an exception performing logging within Log4j. As such, its current name and
package seem quite appropriate to me.
Ralph
On Sep 23,
I don't really like "Log4jException". Log4j is a noun while Logging is a verb -
it is not meant to imply an exception that applies to all of org.apache.logging
but an exception performing logging within Log4j. As such, its current name and
package seem quite appropriate to me.
Ralph
On Sep 23,
Hi All:
I would expected a LoggingException to be in the org.apache.logging package
and be used by all org.apache.logging logging solutions, of which there is
only one now: Log4j,
In org.apache.logging.log4j, I would expect us to have a Log4jException.
I propose:
(1) renaming org.apache.logging
