Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

I have requested a project VM. That should allow us to do whatever we want. Ralph > On Dec 5, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Could we add a new maven profile to deploy the site to an sftp URL? That > could simplify things. > > On 27 November 2015 at 02:45, Ralph Goers

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

Could we add a new maven profile to deploy the site to an sftp URL? That could simplify things. On 27 November 2015 at 02:45, Ralph Goers wrote: > See INFRA-10851. > > Ralph > > On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:38 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > That sounds best. You should probably be the one to request it be

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

See INFRA-10851. Ralph > On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:38 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > That sounds best. You should probably be the one to request it being the > chair and all. ;) > > On 27 November 2015 at 02:32, Ralph Goers > wrote: > The only way I am aware of pub

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

Yes, and sometimes I even look like a chair! Ralph > On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:38 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > That sounds best. You should probably be the one to request it being the > chair and all. ;) > > On 27 November 2015 at 02:32, Ralph Goers > wrote: > Th

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

That sounds best. You should probably be the one to request it being the chair and all. ;) On 27 November 2015 at 02:32, Ralph Goers wrote: > The only way I am aware of publishing a Maven generated site is the way we > are doing it. > > It sounds like Infra needs to give us a project VM to publi

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

The only way I am aware of publishing a Maven generated site is the way we are doing it. It sounds like Infra needs to give us a project VM to publish to. Ralph > On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:28 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Aren't a lot of the other Apache projects using generated sites and not CMS?

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

Aren't a lot of the other Apache projects using generated sites and not CMS? I've seen maven sites, javadocs, and gitbook sites a lot. On 27 November 2015 at 02:15, Ralph Goers wrote: > Yes, of course. But I don't think it would be viewable from a url. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Nov 26, 2015,

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

Yes, of course. But I don't think it would be viewable from a url. Sent from my iPad > On Nov 26, 2015, at 10:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Can the site go to a Dropbox? > > Gary > >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> I believe we might be able to stage the site to

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

Can the site go to a Dropbox? Gary On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I believe we might be able to stage the site to nexus. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Nov 26, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Mikael Ståldal > wrote: > > SSHFS do use sftp. > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Matt Sick

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

I believe we might be able to stage the site to nexus. Sent from my iPad > On Nov 26, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > SSHFS do use sftp. > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >> I don't think that uses sftp. >> >> Other people will probably start complaining

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

SSHFS do use sftp. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > I don't think that uses sftp. > > Other people will probably start complaining about similar things now that > I brought up this issue with infra. > > On 25 November 2015 at 10:47, Mikael Ståldal > wrote: > >> Use SSHFS p

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

I don't think that uses sftp. Other people will probably start complaining about similar things now that I brought up this issue with infra. On 25 November 2015 at 10:47, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > Use SSHFS perhaps? > > http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html > > > http://serverfault.com/questions

Re: What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

Use SSHFS perhaps? http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html http://serverfault.com/questions/135618/is-it-possible-to-use-rsync-over-sftp-without-an-ssh-shell On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Now that they're getting rid of people.apache.org and moving to > home.apache.org

What do we do now to upload the maven site with the new home.apache.org change?

Now that they're getting rid of people.apache.org and moving to home.apache.org which only supports sftp (no scp or rsync support as of now), I'm not sure how we're supposed to stage our site. Infra suggested the CMS thing, but obviously, we don't use that. SFTP is terrible compared to scp or rsync

Maven site

I had to revert the change to upgrade from version 3.0 to 3.3 as that change was apparently not tested. site:stage-deploy gets a NullPointerException. Furthermore, building with 3.1 - 3.3 causes the generated site to be crap. I had to revert the release and spend a couple of hours on this. Pl

Maven site generation for Logging Services and log4j 1.2

I've committed changes to the logging services site SVN (http:// svn.apache,org/repos/asf/logging/site/trunk) and to the log4j 1.2 branch (http://svn,apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/branches/v1_2- branch) that should have a pretty decent structure for a Maven generated Logging Services sit