Re: [NEWS] Component and ComponentBase

2005-01-07 Thread Paul Smith
It's an exceptionally good book, definately worth a read. Ceki Gülcü wrote: At 08:50 PM 1/7/2005, you wrote: Which item is this in Effective Java? He also makes a strong argument (Item 1) to use static factory methods instead of constructors. Did not read the book yet, so can't tell you. I think

RE: [NEWS] Component and ComponentBase

2005-01-07 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 08:50 PM 1/7/2005, you wrote: Which item is this in Effective Java? He also makes a strong argument (Item 1) to use static factory methods instead of constructors. Did not read the book yet, so can't tell you. I think that going down the constructor path can potentially lead to "parameter madne

RE: [NEWS] Component and ComponentBase

2005-01-07 Thread Mark Womack
Which item is this in Effective Java? He also makes a strong argument (Item 1) to use static factory methods instead of constructors. I think that going down the constructor path can potentially lead to "parameter madness" as you add more "required" members that must be set at construction time.