Dear Elias,
Thanks for the ref.!
Sincerely,
Yann-Gaël
Elias Ross a écrit :
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 22:48 -0500, Yoav Shapira wrote:
And it'd be interesting to see a comparison of your tool to checkstyle
and PMD, both fairly well-established and good tools for t
Dear all,
That's a very interesting idea! Especially because checkstyle, PMD, and
SAD (for Software Architectural Defect, the name of our framework) do
not work at the same level of "abstraction". If I am not mistaked,
checkstyle checks coding standards at the source code line level,
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 22:48 -0500, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> And it'd be interesting to see a comparison of your tool to checkstyle
> and PMD, both fairly well-established and good tools for the same
> purpose...
The "findbugs" tool is another possible tool to use and also catches
possible locking and
Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc wrote:
We
develop a
framework to describe design defects synthetically and to detect these
in program source code automatically. We are currently performing
experiments to assess our detection algorithms.
If anybody is considering using that reverse engineering
And it'd be interesting to see a comparison of your tool to checkstyle
and PMD, both fairly well-established and good tools for the same
purpose...
On 2/25/06, Scott Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a very old version of log4j. Feel free to analyze a recent release
> (or the current re
That is a very old version of log4j. Feel free to analyze a recent release (or
the current release), we'd be happy to hear your results.
Thanks
Scott Deboy
COMOTIV SYSTEMS
111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950
Portland, OR 97201
Telephone: 503.224.7496
Cell: 503.997.1367
Fax:
