FYI: I pushed the 2.6 tag to git.
Gary
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> The project-info-reports:scm goal accepts scmTag as a parameter so we
> should be able to configure that as
>
> log4j-${log4jReleaseVersion}
>
> I’ll have to try it though to see if that is actually the
The project-info-reports:scm goal accepts scmTag as a parameter so we should be
able to configure that as
log4j-${log4jReleaseVersion}
I’ll have to try it though to see if that is actually the goal that generates
that page and to see if it breaks anything else.
Ralph
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:
Note that even if you add the tag the web site is still going to point to the
rc tag unless the page is manually modified. Maven creates the source
repository page automatically and uses the tag that was checked out. We would
have to investigate to see if there is some way to override that.
Ral
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Well, the highest number RC would normally be the release, and we haven't
> skipped any releases, right?
>
But why bother with the guess work?
I'll create a tag for 2.6... ;-)
Gary
>
> On 8 June 2016 at 00:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> We
Well, the highest number RC would normally be the release, and we haven't
skipped any releases, right?
On 8 June 2016 at 00:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We should. If a RC does NOT lead to a release, then how can you tell that
> from one that did?
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Ralph
We should. If a RC does NOT lead to a release, then how can you tell that
from one that did?
Gary
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Yes. To be honest I haven’t tagged any of the releases since I started
> tagging them as release candidates. The rc1 tag is what was voted on a
Yes. To be honest I haven’t tagged any of the releases since I started tagging
them as release candidates. The rc1 tag is what was voted on and released.
Ralph
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:43 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I was trying to compare sources while investigating a Clirr issue and I see
>
