age-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 7/5/2008 9:37 AM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw
On Jul 5, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
When does the previous version of Chainsaw get taken out of log4j jar?
Earlier this week I responde
503.997.1367
Fax:503.222.0185
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.comotivsystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 7/5/2008 9:37 AM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw
On Jul 5, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
>
On Jul 5, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
When does the previous version of Chainsaw get taken out of log4j jar?
Earlier this week I responded to questions about how to configure
Chainsaw to use receivers. It turns out he was using the old
version of Chainsaw.
Would be nice to avoi
PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 7/4/2008 10:55 PM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw
On Jul 4, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> Paul Smith skrev den 04-07-2008 02:02:
>>
>>>
>>> I think that there should be a core log
On Jul 4, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Paul Smith skrev den 04-07-2008 02:02:
I think that there should be a core log4j which should cover those
classes described in the printed manual, and that all the other
stuff which has come up since then should go in one or m
Paul Smith skrev den 04-07-2008 02:02:
I think that there should be a core log4j which should cover those
classes described in the printed manual, and that all the other stuff
which has come up since then should go in one or more "extras"
packages which may have a different release cycle t
On Jul 3, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
log4j-receivers-3rdpartydeps?
pretty hokey but a bit more accurate
The first thing that makes me think of is the third party licensing
policy (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) and suggests use of
code that is not under the ASL. I'm
On 04/07/2008, at 9:59 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Paul Smith skrev den 04-07-2008 00:46:
One of the last tasks to complete before a potential 'release' to
the Webstart version of Chainsaw is building a custom Receiver
artifact output that does not include the JMSReceiver & DBReceiv
Paul Smith skrev den 04-07-2008 00:46:
One of the last tasks to complete before a potential 'release' to the
Webstart version of Chainsaw is building a custom Receiver artifact
output that does not include the JMSReceiver & DBReceiver, both of
which require dependent jars that we obviously can
Message-
From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 7/3/2008 4:03 PM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw
On 04/07/2008, at 8:54 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> +1
>
> Not sure about the name chainsaw-receivers (they can be used outside
&
On 04/07/2008, at 8:54 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
+1
Not sure about the name chainsaw-receivers (they can be used outside
Chainsaw).
I'm all ears on suggestions! :) I think it blows too, but my brain is
tired this morning.
Paul
---
+1
Not sure about the name chainsaw-receivers (they can be used outside Chainsaw).
Scott Deboy
COMOTIV SYSTEMS
111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950
Portland, OR 97201
Telephone: 503.224.7496
Cell: 503.997.1367
Fax:503.222.0185
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.comotivsystems.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
