Re: minimal logj, deps

There is a log4j version called mini. It has a separate CVS tree. I was referring to that. At 10:32 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote: Ceki, Where is the mini? A 300k jar is not mini. Mentioning MessageFormatter was a shy *hint* that performance can be improved drastically (again, I don't know what jdk

Re: minimal logj, deps

thanks! --- Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a log4j version called mini. It has a separate CVS tree. I was referring to that. At 10:32 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote: Ceki, Where is the mini? A 300k jar is not mini. Mentioning MessageFormatter was a shy *hint* that

minimal logj, deps

hi devs 1.3 is in alpha so I take the chance to suggest rethinking some design decisions. Some time ago, there was a minimal log4j, basically Logger, FileAppender etc. Why was this direction stalled? log4j has blown up quite a bit, and - while it was hard with 1.2*, it seems impossible today to

Re: minimal logj, deps

At 09:30 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote: hi devs 1.3 is in alpha so I take the chance to suggest rethinking some design decisions. Sure. Some time ago, there was a minimal log4j, basically Logger, FileAppender etc. Why was this direction stalled? log4j has blown up quite a bit, and - while it was hard

Re: minimal logj, deps

Ceki, Where is the mini? A 300k jar is not mini. Mentioning MessageFormatter was a shy *hint* that performance can be improved drastically (again, I don't know what jdk compatibility is required and what platform constraints there are) while having a more Chaitinian overall distribution.