[EMAIL PROTECTED]: logging-log4j/log4j-tests failed

2004-08-17 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: logging-log4j/log4j-tests failed

2004-08-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
I just added jetty to log4j's gump profile. These messages should go away soon. At 10:09 AM 8/17/2004, you wrote: To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PR

cvs commit: logging-log4j build.xml

2004-08-17 Thread psmith
psmith 2004/08/17 02:02:55 Modified:.build.xml Log: applied change from patch in Bug 27817, this just points the JavaDoc api to the correct one. Not sure if it should now point to JDK1.4.2 or not, but this is better than it was before. Revision ChangesPath

Bugzilla & old jakarta email address

2004-08-17 Thread Paul Smith
It appears that most of the Bugzilla items are currently assigned to “[EMAIL PROTECTED]”.  I ’m not sure if that email address has been trashed or not, but since it has been effectively deprecated in favour of the logging.apache.org address, do you think we should update the addresses in t

Your Bugzilla password.

2004-08-17 Thread bugzilla
To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following: E-mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: @rSQAsLR To change your password, go to: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Bugzilla & old jakarta email address

2004-08-17 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Done. At 11:06 AM 8/17/2004, you wrote: It appears that most of the Bugzilla items are currently assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I ’m not sure if that email address has been trashed or not, but since it has been effectively deprecated in favour of the logging.apache.org address, do you think we s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30708] New: - Unwanted log from joranconfigurator

2004-08-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30708] - Unwanted log from joranconfigurator

2004-08-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30709] New: - Manual uses deprecated DOMConfigurator

2004-08-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Bugzilla & old jakarta email address

2004-08-17 Thread Paul Smith
Thanks! > -Original Message- > From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 7:45 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: Bugzilla & old jakarta email address > > Done. > > At 11:06 AM 8/17/2004, you wrote: > >It appears that most of the Bugzilla items