To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project logging-log4j-receivers has an issue affecting its community
integration.
On Sep 18, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>
> On 19.09.2011, at 01:29, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I was confused and mixed something up...
>>>
>>> I *planned* to implement a thread-specific sequence number but never did
On 19.09.2011, at 09:36, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19.09.2011, at 01:29, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 18, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>>>
Sorry, I was confused and mixed something up...
I *planned*
On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:44 AM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>
> On 19.09.2011, at 09:36, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 19.09.2011, at 01:29, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>
On Sep 18, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
> Sor
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
> Which reminds me, completely off-topic, of another idea concerning a custom
> Message implementation:
> A ThreadDumpMessage that would not get any parameter at all and would consist
> of a ThreadDump if it is actually logged, including the Thre
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John Vasileff wrote:
>
> What do you think about an optional LazyRenderMessage interface (I'm sure
> there is a better name for this) that could be used by Message types that
> have expensive constructers?
>
> interface LazyRenderMessage {
> void render();
> }
>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com <
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John Vasileff wrote:
>
>>
>> What do you think about an optional LazyRenderMessage interface (I'm sure
>> there is a better name for this) that could be used by
On Sep 19, 2011, at 4:09 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John Vasileff wrote:
>
> What do you think about an optional LazyRenderMessage interface (I'm sure
> there i
On 19.09.2011, at 22:09, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John Vasileff wrote:
>
> What do you think about an optional LazyRenderMessage interface (I'm sure
> there is a
On Sep 19, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>
> On 19.09.2011, at 22:09, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John Vasileff wrote:
>>
>> What do you think abo
On Sep 19, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19.09.2011, at 22:09, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 20
On Sep 19, 2011, at 6:39 PM, John Vasileff wrote:
>
> package org.apache.logging.log4j.message;
>
> /**
> * A Message that supports lazy initialization.
> */
> public interface InitializingMessage extends Message {
>
> /**
> * Lazily perform expensive initialization tasks that would otherwi
12 matches
Mail list logo