Jenkins build is back to normal : Log4jScala #3

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-1788) Create Apache Logging parent pom

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Sicker closed LOG4J2-1788. --- Closing as version 1 was tagged and released. > Create Apache Logging parent pom > -

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1691) Setup build process for new Git repo logging-log4j-scala, including site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15844132#comment-15844132 ] Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1691: - Jenkins is now set up and properly building. T

Build failed in Jenkins: Log4jBoot #8

See Changes: [Matt Sicker] Migrate to logging-parent [Matt Sicker] Use Log4j 2.8 -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on beam1 (beam) in workspa

Jenkins build is still unstable: Log4j 2.x #2633

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Re: Use of the manual change log

I've updated the output format to be in markdown so it formats more nicely on GitHub and provides an easier to copy/paste version of the release notes for an announce email. Take a look: < https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES.md> On 27 January 2017 at 21:53, Matt Sick

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1691) Setup build process for new Git repo logging-log4j-scala, including site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15844167#comment-15844167 ] Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1691: - Updated the readme file as well. > Setup buil

Fwd: logging-log4j-scala git commit: Add intro to README

I just realized that I added that this brings in log4j-core by default, but it doesn't. We were discussing this before, but I don't remember if we decided whether or not to do that. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: 28 January 2017 at 13:27 Subject: logging-log4j-scala git commi

Re: [ANN] Log4j 2.8 released

Looks like this lost itself outside the list. Anyways, I've updated the template to generate markdown which makes a nice compromise between HTML and plain text. The output on GitHub is copyable into an email, for instance. On 27 January 2017 at 19:33, Matt Sicker wrote: > It's just a velocity te

Jenkins build is still unstable: Log4j 2.x #2634

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Re: [ANN] Log4j 2.8 released

Nice! G On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Looks like this lost itself outside the list. Anyways, I've updated the > template to generate markdown which makes a nice compromise between HTML > and plain text. The output on GitHub is copyable into an email, for > instance. > >

Re: logging-log4j-scala git commit: Update README to be similar to logging-log4j2

Spelling nag: discuss you're changes -> your (Contributing.md) (Away from pc) Remko Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 29, 2017, at 4:13, mattsic...@apache.org wrote: > > discuss you're changes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-

FileAppenderBenchmark

I want to ask a favor: can anyone run the FileAppenderBenchmark benchmark (with -f 1 -wi 10 -i 10 -t 4) and post the summary? Someone is reporting a performance regression. I get a strange error when trying to run JMH benchmarks and wonder if it is just me. Remko Sent from my iPhone

Re: logging-log4j-scala git commit: Add intro to README

Spelling nag: introduced as in Log4j 2.8.1 -> introduced in Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 29, 2017, at 4:27, mattsic...@apache.org wrote: > > introduced > +as in Log4j 2.8.1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@loggin

Re: FileAppenderBenchmark

> On Jan 29, 2017, at 9:38, Remko Popma wrote: > > I want to ask a favor: can anyone run the FileAppenderBenchmark benchmark > (with -f 1 -wi 10 -i 10 -t 4) and post the summary? Someone is reporting a > performance regression. This is the regression report: https://mobile.twitter.com/ceki/st

Re: FileAppenderBenchmark

I can no longer get the benchmarks to work. I get java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Benchmark does not match a class at org.openjdk.jmh.util.ClassUtils.loadClass(ClassUtils.java:90) at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.BaseRunner.runBenchmark(BaseRunner.java:198) at org.openjdk.jmh.