Author: grobmeier
Date: Tue Aug 16 09:26:07 2011
New Revision: 1158164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1158164view=rev
Log:
maven logo for new branding
Added:
logging/log4j/companions/component/trunk/src/site/resources/images/logos/
Author: grobmeier
Date: Tue Aug 16 09:27:03 2011
New Revision: 1158165
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1158165view=rev
Log:
moved build plugin configuration to parent project
Modified:
logging/log4j/companions/component/trunk/pom.xml
logging/log4j/companions/extras/trunk/pom.xml
Author: grobmeier
Date: Tue Aug 16 09:40:51 2011
New Revision: 1158173
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1158173view=rev
Log:
removed build targets from build file
Modified:
logging/log4j/companions/component/trunk/build.xml
logging/log4j/companions/extras/trunk/build.xml
Chainsaw needs a companions release - which one exactly?
Now the poms are in a ok state, means they are cleaned up but not
100% functional. Now its time to choose the first companion, fix the
branding and try to make a release of it.
Scott, seems it is christmas already :-)
Receivers depends on Component, so I would think Component would be the first
to push.
On Aug 16, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Chainsaw needs a companions release - which one exactly?
Now the poms are in a ok state, means they are cleaned up but not
100% functional. Now
I just found out that (except zerconfig) all companiosn use jdk 1.4
features - there is need to use 1.4 compiler settings now.
You can go forward with 1.4, if you like without caring on companions
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
I think timing-wise I
We can delete the zeroconf companion, I integrated zeroconf support directly
into all network-based appenders and receivers, using reflection.
Scott
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
I just found out that (except zerconfig) all companiosn use jdk
Thanks Christian!!
I agree, component makes sense because of the dependencies.
This is great! Time for me to figure out why that test is failing.
Scott
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org wrote:
Receivers depends on Component, so I would think Component would be
I agree, component makes sense because of the dependencies.
Fine, lets start with it then
This is great! Time for me to figure out why that test is failing.
Cool - at the same time I will try to complete the branding and then
move on to the release parts of maven
Cheers!
Scott
On Tue,
It has not been released yet, so I guess performing:
svn delete https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/companions/zeroconf/
would be ok.
Or does anybody think it should go to some kind of attic?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
We can delete
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44932
Daniel Serodio asfbugzilla.e.dsero...@neverbox.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
11 matches
Mail list logo
