https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945
--- Comment #4 from Prasad Gawande gawandepra...@gmail.com 2011-08-25
06:45:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 27433
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27433
SimpleERRdcProject
--
Configure bugmail:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project logging-log4j-receivers has an issue affecting its community
I have commented it, because it does not build on my machine (mac).
But we can leave that in the pom. Any comments to the rest of my
message?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org wrote:
This following patch would kill building NTEventAppender.dll which has been
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org wrote:
I didn't see any commit messages for these revisions which I likely means
that Christian isn't subscribed to the log4j-dev list using
grobme...@apache.org and the commit messages from SVN got bounced by the
mailing list.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51721
Bug #: 51721
Summary: Log4j snapshots should be in the Apache Snapshot
Repository
Product: Log4j
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project logging-log4j-receivers has an issue affecting its community
The comm...@logging.apache.org mailing list is now accepting subscription
requests at commits-subscr...@logging.apache.org. The current plan is to
redirect all SVN commit messages from logging services projects to
comm...@logging.apache.org and to discontinue any commit message logging to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945
Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
We've supported both building with either Ant or Maven for many years, though
releases have been exclusively Maven for a while. The Ant build and test
scripts were necessary to build and test on JDK 1.3 and earlier (which also
required an earlier version of Ant, though I forget the specific
On Aug 26, 2011, at 12:12 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
We've supported both building with either Ant or Maven for many years, though
releases have been exclusively Maven for a while. The Ant build and test
scripts were necessary to build and test on JDK 1.3 and earlier (which also
required an
10 matches
Mail list logo
