Re: Hopefully last RC for 2.1 ?

2014-10-14 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I have an app that I was able to run successfully on a vanilla Tomcat. I need to check the security settings on te server. Regardless, this should not cause initialization to fail. Ralph On Tuesday, October 14, 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > IIRC, it looks something Matt was working on recently a

Re: log4j-2.0 questions

2011-06-20 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
Hey Mark, thanks for participating in this! See my comments inline below. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > My name is Mark and I had a few discussions about log4j 2.0 with Ralph > lately. It is about the question whether log4j-2.0 would be a candidate for >

Re: log4j v2 binding?

2011-09-07 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
The main API is log4j2-api. The binding to the implementation happens in LogManager. log4j12-api is the support for applications written to Log4j 1.2, slfjj-impl is the binding to allow applications using SLF4J's API to work with the Log4j 2.0 implementation, and log4j2-jcl provides the support fo

Re: log4j2 parameterized msg with throwable

2011-09-19 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John Vasileff wrote: > > What do you think about an optional LazyRenderMessage interface (I'm sure > there is a better name for this) that could be used by Message types that > have expensive constructers? > > interface LazyRenderMessage { > void render(); > } >

Re: log4j2 parameterized msg with throwable

2011-09-19 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com < ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, John Vasileff wrote: > >> >> What do you think about an optional LazyRenderMessage interface (I'm sure >> there is a

Re: log4j2 parameterized msg with throwable

2011-09-20 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
That actually is an interesting concept. I can picture registering a ThreadDumpMessage along with a Filter and when the Filter matches the Message gets logged. The only problem with that is I'm not sure I'd want to include that in the logging system itself since it could only be evaluated as log m

Re: log4j2 parameterized msg with throwable

2011-09-29 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
Well, that is true as far as the Java Language spec goes. However, there is now a class that will only compile if JDK 1.6 is available as the classes are new to that release. So yes, even though the source code is 1.5 compatible it still would be good to let people know that they have to use JDK 1.

ApacheCon NA 2011

2011-10-04 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I'm just wondering if anyone besides me will be attending ApacheCon NA 2011 in Vancouver next month. If so, I'd love to meet in person. I Ralph

Re: ApacheCon NA 2011

2011-10-25 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I haven't gotten any replies to this. I hope others from the logging community will be attending ApacheCon. Ralph On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:55 AM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com < ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I'm just wondering if anyone besides me will be attending Apa