[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-12-tests (in module logging-log4j-12) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-12-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: Alternative Asynchronous Appender

Hi Curt, Thanks for taking the time to reply. I'm afraid I don't fully understand the design decision to enable logging events to be discarded. If a piece of information is sufficiently expendable, then why bother logging it in the first place? I guess the community pressure to incorporate

RE: [PROPOSAL] SocketHubAppender change - allow auto port choice

+1 Scott -Original Message- From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 11/5/2007 4:55 PM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: [PROPOSAL] SocketHubAppender change - allow auto port choice I'd like to propose a change to SocketHubAppender code to allow it automatically choose