Hi all,
thanks a lot for your mails. It seems that Log4J is definitive the right choice.
Bye
Matthias
--
Matthias Petersen
ms management systems gmbh
Krokamp 29
24539 Neumünster
Fon: +49. 4321. 9995-49
Fax: +49. 4321. 9995-41
E-Mail: [EMAIL
Matthias,
Admittedly, many of us at here at log4j-user@ are biased in favor of log4j.
At 08:14 AM 10/27/2003 +0100, Matthias Petersen wrote:
Hi all,
thanks a lot for your mails. It seems that Log4J is definitive the right
choice.
Bye
Matthias
--
If I read the commons-logging articles correctly, this is exactly how commons-
logging came to be. A wrapper grown dynamic.
Tom
Quoting Lutz Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One additional quick thought: someone mentioned using Commons Logging to
switch back and forth between JDK logging,
Unless I am mistaken, commons-logging was always dynamic. It always used
classloader tricks to determine which logging API to use.
At 02:26 PM 10/27/2003 +0100, Tbee wrote:
If I read the commons-logging articles correctly, this is exactly how commons-
logging came to be. A wrapper grown dynamic.
Howdy,
This is true -- in fact it grew out of a classloader discovery type mechanism into
more of a wrapper ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:42 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE:
Unless I am mistaken, commons-logging was always dynamic. It always used
classloader tricks to determine which logging API to use.
Ok, then I stand corrected (and need to reread the articles ;-).
Tom
-
To unsubscribe,
I was reading the plan page of log4j 1.3 and found this:
Domains: This is a very powerful and innovative concept that extends the
notion of hierarchical loggers. It will also allow dynamic logging with
pin-point accuracy. It was first suggested to me by Scott Stark of JBoss
fame.
Is there a
Hi Doug,
Domains will be presented at ApacheCon 2003. The slides will be available
after the conference.
At 03:36 PM 10/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I was reading the plan page of log4j 1.3 and found this:
Domains: This is a very powerful and innovative concept that extends the
notion of
Is there a writeup somewhere or can someone point me to an archived
message
that might describe the high level intension of Domains and how they will
fit in the current log4j object world of loggers, appenders, levels,
filters, etc.?
Domains will be presented at ApacheCon 2003. The slides will
