uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:20 PM
>Subject: Re: FileAppender support for file.encoding property
>
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ooops. I am afraid you are somewhat late.
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: FileAppender support for file.encoding property
>
> Hi,
>
> Ooops. I am afraid you are somewhat late. Encoding support is already in
log4j 1.2alpha5.
>
Hi,
Ooops. I am afraid you are somewhat late. Encoding support is already in log4j
1.2alpha5.
Did you already code? If you did, it would be interesting to see if your code differs
from what already exists.
To answer your question. All of 1, 2, 3 and 4 are OK. My order of preference is:
1,
Ceki,
I am writing the code to modify FileAppender to support a file encoding
i.e. output a Character encoding other than the default for the host
platform.
How would you like this information?
1. A diff result as a file ?
2. A diff result as a copy/paste into an email (easy to read)
3. W
