RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Lutz Michael
Thanks a lot Steve, that looks great. -Original Message- From: Steve Ebersole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:25 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003 sample property file entry looked like: steve=debug michael=info Not

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Steve Ebersole
rn NEUTRAL; } } -Original Message- From: Lutz Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:17 PM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003 Steve, maybe I should know this, but how did you set the level override in

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Lutz Michael
this. -Original Message- From: Steve Ebersole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:55 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003 Actually, our intial stab at this was not too much different. Basically, it was applying a filter which use

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Steve Ebersole
: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:46 PM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003 > obviously it would be optimal to turn on debug/info calls > only for a given user as opposed to everyone. I am not sure about performance ramifications, but couldn'

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Lutz Michael
Heaberlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:46 PM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003 > obviously it would be optimal to turn on debug/info calls > only for a given user as opposed to everyone. I am not sure about

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Scott Heaberlin
> obviously it would be optimal to turn on debug/info calls > only for a given user as opposed to everyone. I am not sure about performance ramifications, but couldn't this be achieved by having some code that could add appenders at runtime with both an MDC filter checking, say, "username", etc c

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Lutz Michael
rsole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:04 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003 >> - a new logging dimension in the form of logging domains This is the second time I've seen reference to this concept. However, I have been unable

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-24 Thread Steve Ebersole
>> - a new logging dimension in the form of logging domains This is the second time I've seen reference to this concept. However, I have been unable to find anything about it. What is its intended purpose? Specifically, I am thinking of a logging I was given by my project manager at the beginni

RE: Log4j presentation at ApacheCon 2003

2003-07-22 Thread Paul Smith
Hi Ceki > Here is a draft of my log4j presentation abstract for ApacheCon 2003. [snip] > This will first quickly introduce log4j and proceed to discuss each of > the aforementioned improvements in some detail. Looks good.come see everyone. Will they web cast your talk? I don't want to miss out