Re: DOMConfig and log4j:Configuration

2002-07-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Try etc.. That's "log4j.dtd", not "C:/Program Files/.../log4j.dtd". At 19:24 10.07.2002 +0800, you wrote: >I am using the Tomcat4.0 and struts for my web app. > >we have written the following loginconfig.xml > > >please some one can help on this...most urgent > > > >4.0/webapps/log4j.dtd"> >

RE: DOMConfig and log4j:Configuration

2001-05-13 Thread Thilo Schottelius
- From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sonntag, 13. Mai 2001 18:47 To: LOG4J Users Mailing List Subject: Re: DOMConfig and log4j:Configuration Thilo Schottelius wrote: > Dear Robert, dear Jeff, > > I read your conversation. To my opinion the workaround (removing th

Re: DOMConfig and log4j:Configuration

2001-05-13 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
Thilo Schottelius wrote: > Dear Robert, dear Jeff, > > I read your conversation. To my opinion the workaround (removing the doctype > comment which refers to the DTD) has the disadvantage that your XML file is > "well formed", but (possibly) not valid! IMHO so what? > I think that the problem i

Re: DOMConfig and log4j:Configuration

2001-05-11 Thread Thilo Schottelius
Dear Robert, dear Jeff, I read your conversation. To my opinion the workaround (removing the doctype comment which refers to the DTD) has the disadvantage that your XML file is "well formed", but (possibly) not valid! I think that the problem is caused by the URI/namespace: http://jakarta.apach

Re: DOMConfig and log4j:Configuration

2001-04-24 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
Jeff Singer wrote: > Hi All > > I am using the DOMConfigurator in my application with the following config > file: > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/";> > > > > > > > >