age-
> From: Colin MacDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:52 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: RE: Separating stdout and stderr
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > There is actually no need to log to both stdout and
> I'm still puzzled by why you want to do this. If stdout and stderr are
both
> just writing to the screen, why differentiate them? And if one is being
> redirected to a file, why not use a file appender?
"just writing to the screen" is not quite the way to think of it.
There's a reasong it's
- Original Message -
From: "Colin MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:52 AM
Subject: RE: Separating stdout and stderr
> I'm still puzzled by why you want to do this. If stdo
> -Original Message-
>
> There is actually no need to log to both stdout and stderr at the
> same time
> so it's just a matter of sending some output to one or the other
> from within
> the same class. Maybe I should simply be logging at different
> levels? Just
> want to know what the "
f doing this is.
- Original Message -
From: "Colin MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: RE: Separating stdout and stderr
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > We n
> -Original Message-
>
> We need to log to stdout in some places and stderr in others and both in
> some other places. What's the best way to handle this? Will I need
> separate loggers for each type of output or is this somehow handled by
> appenders?
Well, first, why are you writing t
