It's known that log4j has a good performance even 'on an AMD Duron clocked
at 800Mhz running JDK 1.3.1' machine.
If I have lot of appenders, for example, a socket appender, which will cost
0.1 second to communicate with the socket server, and there's still a file
appender in the system all the
In almost all cases this is correct, the logging done to the appender is
all done within the same thread.
Only the AsyncAppender performs it's appending in a separate thread.
regards,
Paul Smith
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 19:32, Yu Xiang Xi (Maveo) wrote:
It's known that log4j has a good
