Thanks for the quick response and sorry for overlooking the obvious. This,
of course, fixed the problem.
Ed.
At 07:33 PM 2/13/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>You are not respecting log4j.dtd. The errors have nothing to do with
>the log4j version. :-)
>
>You must declare appender elements, followed by
You are not respecting log4j.dtd. The errors have nothing to do with
the log4j version. :-)
You must declare appender elements, followed by category or logger
elements, and the root element.
HTH, Ceki
At 09:32 13.02.2002 -0500, Edward Zarecor wrote:
>I've attached a copy of the xml config file
I've attached a copy of the xml config file that is generating the
errors. It's still logging by the way. The only difference is the errors
are spit out to standard out when I change which jar I'm point to. Thanks
for any help.
Ed.
At 12:17 AM 2/13/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Edward,
>
>Could
Edward,
Could you please provide the XML configuration file? It would make it easier
to deal with the problem you are encountering. Thanks, Ceki
At 18:08 12.02.2002 -0500, Edward Zarecor wrote:
>I'm trying to migrate some working code from log4j 1.1.3 to 1.2beta. The
>source compiles fine, but
I'm trying to migrate some working code from log4j 1.1.3 to 1.2beta. The
source compiles fine, but I'm getting the following messages at
runtime. I've noted changes to the .dtd, e.g., that class is not required,
not implied. However, the dtd still allows category and appender tags
inside t
