I suspect utility code that is performing its own configuration of Log4j
without your knowledge. Or, depending on where Log4j is, it might be
another webapp which is configuring itself that is affecting your
application. If Log4j.jar is in shared/lib or common/lib, and there is no
log4j.jar
I came to the conclusion that it wouldn't fix it. You can review the
java memory model mailing list for today to find out why. Look for the
"solution to double-check locking" thread.
James Stauffer wrote:
I have thought that pattern would fix the problem also but I have
never seen anyone men
I'm working on a webapp using java 1.5 on tomcat5.0.28 that has some
multithreaded processes that run behind the scenes. When the app is running
log4j.properties is loaded and initially works correctly. After a few
minutes (its varies) the configuration changes. The layout switches to the
d
Does anyone know when 1.3 will be available? At one point it was expected
out this past October, but now there no mention of the release date...
thanks,
Steve Pringle
(1.2.12) What I have is this log4j.properties:
log4j.rootLogger=info,console,file
log4j.logger.console=warn
log4j.appender.console=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender
log4j.appender.console.layout=org.apache.log4j.SimpleLayout
log4j.logger.file=info
log4j.appender.file=org.apache.log4j.FileAppender
I have thought that pattern would fix the problem also but I have
never seen anyone mention it before.
On 12/2/05, Trenton D. Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, a co-worker and I just came up with a possible solution.
>
> public static Object getInstance()
> {
>if (instance == null)
On Dec 2, 2005, at 6:44 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
log4j should -definately- be -extremely into- synchronization
issues. I
myself log -a whole lot-, and if I'm hit by synchs on every log
even if
the debug or trace is turned off, this will eat a -ton- of time.
Remember
that synching becomes
All,
It appears that the SMTPAppender has to be fully defined in the config
file. The host, to, from must be set. I get a stack trace trying to
create the appender and its complaining about a InternetAddress.
I need to set those params at some point after the application is
running. So, I must
Quoting Alexander Rohde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello.
>
> I have several Tomcat webapps running on our server.
> This webapps are writing all output to catalina.out.
> I think they_re all firing to stdout.
> Now, I try to catch that output and write it to an "per WEBAPP" file.
> But, depending on
That's the standard 'Singleton' pattern. If you follow all the stuff about
Double-Checked locking, that's what they come up with too...
-Burton
-Original Message-
From: Trenton D. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:12 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject:
We have recently had some nasty problems w/ log4j synchronization. This was
laid out in a recent post to this list; "threading issue with log4j" on Nov
23, 2005
It is a problem w/ the 1.2.X code base, which synchronizes within the
callAppenders method of Category. This is a fundamental class of lo
Actually, a co-worker and I just came up with a possible solution.
public static Object getInstance()
{
if (instance == null)
createInstance();
return instance;
}
private static synchronized void createInstance()
{
if (instance == null)
instance = new Object();
}
So, we end up ha
Hello.
I have several Tomcat webapps running on our server.
This webapps are writing all output to catalina.out.
I think they_re all firing to stdout.
Now, I try to catch that output and write it to an "per WEBAPP" file.
But, depending on the logging level, I only get much or less output from
tom
Ah ... Light dawns...
So (ripping the printlns out into methods)
int countOfLoggers = 0;
Enumeration loggers =
LogManager.getLoggerRepository().getCurrentLoggers();
if(loggers != null){
while(loggers.hasMoreElements()){
Logger l = (Logger)loggers.nextElement();
i
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Curt Arnold wrote:
|
| On Dec 2, 2005, at 12:19 AM, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
| >
| > Could the optimizer move the "instanceIndicator = 1" up one line? Perhaps by
| > analyzing exactly what's happening it could, because it knows, or *thinks*
| > it won't affect anything.
|
|
15 matches
Mail list logo
