Hi All,
Backup files are not getting created. After reaching the 10mb its rolling
the same file.
Is anything wrong with the configuration?
Thanks,
Praveen
Spranger, Steffen gft-systems.de> writes:
Hallo,
I log communication to an external system with e.g. logger.debug(...).
In a catch-block I log errors by logger.error(...).
What I want is, not to keep all the debug-messages in good case, but =
keeping them in an error-case.
I'm wond
I understand now! Thanks a bunch Javier and Curt. That makes things much
simpler and best part about it is that I get to delete a bunch of unneeded
classes now :)
Thanks again,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 1:19 PM
On Feb 8, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
Do you think refactoring to a less "extended" approach is a
possibility.
At first glance, I'd propose using two loggers:
}catch(Exception ex){
// traditional logger, with stack trace
ourLogger.fatal("Problem in such-and
On 2/8/06, DeSantis, MJ Mark @ IS (7179) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is for nice, user-friendly, user-understandable, messages. So in other
> words
> if we, for instance, caught an exception and wanted the stacktrace to go
> to
> the file but we still wanted something for the user to show up in
I think I see your point - but I'll discribe our situation anyway and you
tell me what you think might be a resonable solution.
We have a window (advisory window) that is basically similar to chainsaw but
it's integrated into our program and it only shows logging events that pass
a filter which f
Thanks again Javier..
--Praveen
On 2/8/06, Javier Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've used it in both windows and linux with equal success :)
>
> I don't have a solaris machine handy, but I'd guess it works, too.
>
> On 2/8/06, Praveen Kumar Hasthalapuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
I've used it in both windows and linux with equal success :)
I don't have a solaris machine handy, but I'd guess it works, too.
On 2/8/06, Praveen Kumar Hasthalapuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One more basic question,
> Will all platforms support configuring log4j.xml?
> Like windows, solari
I strongly recommend avoiding it.
Many people feel that the need to add a new level when they are
really trying to control the audience that receives the message, not
the significance of the message to the audience. If you are trying
to control the audience, you can accomplish that through
One more basic question,
Will all platforms support configuring log4j.xml?
Like windows, solaris and Linux?
Thanks,
Praveen
On 2/8/06, Praveen Kumar Hasthalapuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Javier.
>
> -- Praveen
>
> On 2/8/06, Javier Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Exactly.
Thanks Javier.
-- Praveen
On 2/8/06, Javier Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly.
>
> cheers,
>
> --
> Javier González Nicolini
>
> On 2/8/06, Praveen Kumar Hasthalapuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Oh it means, I need to transform entire properties to xml file right?
> >
> > Reg
Exactly.
cheers,
--
Javier González Nicolini
On 2/8/06, Praveen Kumar Hasthalapuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh it means, I need to transform entire properties to xml file right?
>
> Regards,
> Praveen
>
> On 2/8/06, Javier Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/8/06, Praveen Kum
If I wanted to provide my own logger class which provided extra logging
method calls associated with custom levels for my application, what is the
best way to wrap log4j's Logger class? Do I have to be concerned with
implementing LoggerFactory?
If anyone has done this please let me know and expla
Oh it means, I need to transform entire properties to xml file right?
Regards,
Praveen
On 2/8/06, Javier Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/8/06, Praveen Kumar Hasthalapuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Currently we are using *log4j.properties* in our product, we h
On 2/8/06, Praveen Kumar Hasthalapuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Currently we are using *log4j.properties* in our product, we have several
> log files with respect to modules.
> We need to use *filters* for one of the *module* (Say module_1) only.
> So, i have configured *log4j.xml
Hi All,
Currently we are using *log4j.properties* in our product, we have several
log files with respect to modules.
We need to use *filters* for one of the *module* (Say module_1) only.
So, i have configured *log4j.xml* for this module alone to *filter* the
specific messages and
remaining modules
16 matches
Mail list logo