Getting binaries for LogMF

2007-07-05 Thread wilmot
Hi, I wonder how can I get binaries for LogMF Companion. All links available from page http://logging.apache.org/log4j/companions/logmf/download.html are dead. Any advice? Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SPAM (Bayesain Analysis)] - How to always log the host name? - Bayesian Filter detected spam

2007-07-05 Thread Bender Heri
Put the hostname somewhere at app start into MDC: MDC.put( hostname, myHostname ); The conversionPattern can resolve MDC values by using the switch %X{ID}. The ID in my example is hostname (without quotes). Heri -Original Message- From: Hans Schwaebli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How do I configure Log4J to send different levels to different appenders

2007-07-05 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Curt Arnold wrote: Set root threshold to debug, attach both appenders to root. Write custom filters for your rules and attach the filters to the appenders. By custom filter, do you mean writing my own Java class implementing org.apache.log4j.spi.Filter? Is it really not possible to

Re: SMTPAppender ignores Threshold value

2007-07-05 Thread Wayne Cannon
Reasonable? While you make a good point about the seeming arbitrariness of the default trigger, it really is pretty trivial code. In my case, and I suspect many others, the desirable trigger for sending out recent e-mail logs would be something entirely separate from log level. --Wayne

Re: AW: SMTPAppender ignores Threshold value

2007-07-05 Thread jaikiran pai
As Patrick mentioned, the code to implement this is really trivial with getters and setters. The whole point behind trying to have this TriggerLevel is, currently the TriggeringEventEvaluator does nothing other than comparing the logging event level with some threshold (currently ERROR). Users

AW: SMTPAppender ignores Threshold value

2007-07-05 Thread Wyss Patrick
certainly it is true that the code for your own TriggeringEventEvaluator is trivial. however my personal opinion is that being able to set the triggering level is a requirement which is common enough to be implemented in the SMTPAppender. e.g. setting it to FATAL because you only want to know

Re: How to always log the host name?

2007-07-05 Thread James Stauffer
I had added the hostname as an MDC value at application startup to achieve that. On 7/4/07, Hans Schwaebli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I configure the log4j logging to add the hostname information into the logging output? Most naturally would be to find a conversion character for the

UDPAppender in the Log4j.1.3

2007-07-05 Thread epsonic
Hi, I'm currently trying to use the Log4j UDPAppender in the version 1.3. Here is my Appender configuration: appender name=UDP class=org.apache.log4j.net.UDPAppender layout class=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout /layout /appender After executing my application I'm geting

Re: log4j as good as jack daniels??

2007-07-05 Thread James Stauffer
On 7/5/07, Mike Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do all of the threads also write to the same file? Yes. Would there be any issue with multiple threads writing to the same file? No. On 7/5/07, James Stauffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and if you go the latter route, do you have to

Re: Getting binaries for LogMF

2007-07-05 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jul 5, 2007, at 3:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wonder how can I get binaries for LogMF Companion. All links available from page http://logging.apache.org/log4j/ companions/logmf/download.html are dead. Any advice? Thanks! The links were to where logmf would be once it had

SocketHubAppender

2007-07-05 Thread Philip Denno
The project I am working on is very multi - threaded ( 500 threads) and I have implemented the SocketHubAppender to send all the events to Chainsaw. Everything works fine (most times) but occasionally I get the following stack trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0 = 0 at

Re: AW: SMTPAppender ignores Threshold value

2007-07-05 Thread Curt Arnold
I've filed bug 42823 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi? id=42823) for this thread and suggest that further discussion take place either in the bug report or on log4j-dev as it has moved beyond just a usage question. The subject line should be changed on any new thread since

RE: UDPAppender in the Log4j.1.3

2007-07-05 Thread Scott Deboy
This is a bug in UDPAppender - I'm planning on committing a fix to this soon (before next Monday, hopefully). Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL

Re: SocketHubAppender

2007-07-05 Thread Paul Smith
Can you post a full stack trace of this? Which log4j version are you using? Neither the latest 1.2.x series or from trunk appear to match up the line #'s. Perhaps you are using an older 1.2, because in the latest 1.2 version of SocketHubAppender that exception is not logged (there is a