Make sure you use the download, build and use the trunk version of Log4j 2.
The JSON format is final or near final in trunk and the same as in rc1.
Gary
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com> wrote:
> I have managed to get logstash to work with Log4
Hi,
I do not see (me, others may chime in) supporting log4j 1.2 serialized
events out of the box soon. I think the best solution would be to use a
Logstash appender or wait until the Logstash server supports Logj4j 2.0.
Gary
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Karl Kildén wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Logsta
FYI, the link is
http://blog.yeradis.com/2013/10/logstash-and-apache-log4j-or-how-to.html
Gary
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Karl Kildén wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Logstash is highly extensible and they include a plugin called "log4j". It
> works out of the box with log4j, see this guide for some scr
I have managed to get logstash to work with Log4j 2 by using the "tcp"
input for logstash and json.
Log4j 2:
Logstash:
input {
tcp {
port => 4560
codec => "json"
}
}
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Karl Kildén wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Logstash
Hi,
Logstash is highly extensible and they include a plugin called "log4j". It
works out of the box with log4j, see this guide for some screenshots and
such
http://blog.yeradis.com/2013/10/logstash-and-apache-log4j-or-how-to.htmlThat
plugin does use the socket appender.
I have used this for some
So logstash expects serialized Java Log4j 1.2 event objects over a socket?
That's not going to work with 2.0 out of the box since our implement is
different. Can you provide more information to make sure we all understand each
other please?
Gary
Original message From: Karl Ki
Ajay,
Can we continue this discussion on the log4j-user mailing list?
Log4j2 currently does not have a MemoryMappedAppender. As I said, this is on
the todo list, but has low priority.
If you just want buffered logging, please check out log4j2's
RandomAccessFileAppender.
Sent from my iPhone
(Resending as I was using the wrong From: address and the list software
rejected my message.)
> Hi,
>
> That appender is on my todo list but I haven't had a chance to review it or
> work on it. If you want to experiment with it and add your feedback to the
> Jira ticket that would be great.
>