Re: Flushing FileAppender explicitly

2013-03-25 Thread Ralph Goers
straightforward way to do a "flush", I don't > know why basic functionality is much more obscured compared to 1.x. But this > may be because the increase in complexity. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Flus

Re: Flushing FileAppender explicitly

2013-03-25 Thread adischlesinger
do a "flush", I don't know why basic functionality is much more obscured compared to 1.x. But this may be because the increase in complexity. -- View this message in context: http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Flushing-FileAppender-explicitly-tp36205p36285.html Sent from

Re: Flushing FileAppender explicitly

2013-03-23 Thread Ralph Goers
n cannot be extended. Thanks! > Adrian > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Flushing-FileAppender-explicitly-tp36205.html > Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --

Flushing FileAppender explicitly

2013-03-18 Thread adischlesinger
s far as I managed to find out, pertains to a "manager" member which cannot be accessed. The RollingFileAppender is also final an cannot be extended. Thanks! Adrian -- View this message in context: http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Flushing-FileAppender-explicitly-tp36205.html Sent fr