Perfect.
> On Dec 2, 2024, at 12:31, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> On 2.12.2024 19:26, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> Seems like it might be useful to include the 2.x dependencies in the 3.x bom
>> file then?
>
> They are already there:
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.loggi
Hi Matt,
On 2.12.2024 19:26, Matt Sicker wrote:
Seems like it might be useful to include the 2.x dependencies in the 3.x bom
file then?
They are already there:
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-bom/3.0.0-beta3
Piotr
Seems like it might be useful to include the 2.x dependencies in the 3.x bom
file then?
> On Nov 28, 2024, at 07:40, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On 28.11.2024 13:47, PavelTurk wrote:
>> Thank you very much for your help. I've understood how it works. I just
>> wonder did you dec
Hi Pavel,
On 28.11.2024 13:47, PavelTurk wrote:
Thank you very much for your help. I've understood how it works. I just wonder did you decide to go this way because
you plan to continue version 2?
In January this year we decided not to continue the development of Log4j
API 3.
The reason fo
Hi Piotr,
Thank you very much for your help. I've understood how it works. I just wonder
did you decide to go this way because
you plan to continue version 2?
Best regards, Pavel
On 11/28/24 13:40, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
Hi Pavel,
On 28.11.2024 11:36, PavelTurk wrote:
I work only with JP
Hi Pavel,
On 28.11.2024 11:36, PavelTurk wrote:
I work only with JPMS and decided to test log4j 3. As I understand the
last version is 3.0.0-beta3
but there is no log4j-slf4j2-impl for this version:
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-slf4j2-impl
Could anyone
