Thanks Remko for the valuable insight on queue size and ring buffer size in
log4j and logback. I will make adjustments to the settings and run the
test again.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I finally got around to looking at the test results you posted on Gi
Michael,
I finally got around to looking at the test results you posted on Github (
https://github.com/michaelzhou999/logging-profiling).
Very extensive testing, I can tell you put a lot of work into it!
I was initially a bit surprised by your Log4J2 finding that at ten threads
or more, synchron
ed?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/log4j-2-official-release-date-tp40916p40979.html
> Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
Very interesting...
All tests were performed with a dual core. But what results can we expect if
single core is used?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/log4j-2-official-release-date-tp40916p40979.html
Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list
Hey, that's my favorite log4j question!
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Performance
Enjoy!
Remko
On Monday, September 30, 2013, Navindian wrote:
> Performance wise, log4j 1.x is better or log4j 2?
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Jingdong Sun
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Can a
I would say, it depends on the underlying System.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/log4j-2-official-release-date-tp40916p40958.html
Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Performance wise, log4j 1.x is better or log4j 2?
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Jingdong Sun wrote:
> Can anyone tell me when the log4j 2 official release will be available?
>
> Thanks.
> Jingdong Sun
> InfoSphere Streams Development
> Phone 507 253-5958 (T/L 553-5958)
> jind...@us.ibm.com
-official-release-date-tp40916p40953.html
Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h
the OSGi interface, which
> is
> bad practise. Last Friday I had a discussion with my superior and we ended
> with the question whether it makes sense to write our own lightweight
> interchangeable logger implementation.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> htt
ext:
http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/log4j-2-official-release-date-tp40916p40951.html
Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For
Hi Remko,
You can find the micro-benchmarking tool I wrote on Github:
https://github.com/michaelzhou999/logging-profiling
Drop me a message if you have any questions. Thanks
Michael
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I'd be interested to see your benchmarking
It sounds like you have already done quite a bit of analysis on the problem. If
you have specific suggestions on how to improve things, or better yet, can
provide patches that show how to do it they would be most welcome!
Ralph
> On Sep 28, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Michael Zhou wrote:
>
> The micro-
s message in context:
http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/log4j-2-official-release-date-tp40916p40929.html
Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@lo
Michael,
I'd be interested to see your benchmarking code and results. Is it possible for
you to share them?
Remko
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2013/09/29, at 7:58, Michael Zhou wrote:
>
> The micro-benchmark testing I wrote to compare Log4j 1 and 2 shows
> considerable performance gain in favor
The micro-benchmark testing I wrote to compare Log4j 1 and 2 shows
considerable performance gain in favor of Log4j 2. I have only one request
for your consideration: simplifying the way to get all loggers in the
system and set/reset logging levels for certain loggers. This is very easy
to do in L
I'd prefer to turn this around and ask a couple of questions:
1. Why do you need to know the "official release" date? Is something blocking
you from using Log4j 2?
2. Are you currently using the beta releases? Are you satisfied that it is
production ready in your environment?
The answers to t
Hello,
There is no official release date. My guess is a couple of months, it could
be one, it could be three.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jingdong Sun wrote:
> Can anyone tell me when the log4j 2 official release will be available?
>
> Thanks.
> Jingdong Sun
> InfoSphere Streams De
Can anyone tell me when the log4j 2 official release will be available?
Thanks.
Jingdong Sun
InfoSphere Streams Development
Phone 507 253-5958 (T/L 553-5958)
jind...@us.ibm.com
18 matches
Mail list logo
