Dirk Ooms wrote:
And what about the log4j.dtd which is still in the 1.3alpha6 distribution? Has
it any value?
Some, but it would only catch a small set of errors (misspelling
appender for example), but would not catch bad class names, bad file
values, missing attributes, etc.
--
And what about the log4j.dtd which is still in the 1.3alpha6 distribution? Has
it any value?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dirk Ooms wrote:
Hi,
i am a bit puzzled on how i should do an apriori validation of a log4j.xml in
log4j1.3 (without applying it to a LoggerRepository).
The XML format used by log4j was not designed so that it can be
effectively validated using standard XML validation technologies. It
Hi,
i am a bit puzzled on how i should do an apriori validation of a log4j.xml in
log4j1.3 (without applying it to a LoggerRepository).
can I still use the .dtd? but I am wondering whether the .dtd is still in sync
with what is happening in the JoranConfigurator, e.g. if i remember well the
.d
