t;
>> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
>> I would if I could, but I can't so I shan't...
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Remko Popma [mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:32 AM
>> To: Log4J Users List
>> Sub
pril 29, 2014 8:32 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: maven build for source does not work
>
> Walter,
>
> It's open source though. Nothing stops you from helping out.
>
> Best regards,
> Remko
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 2014/04/29, at 22:2
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
I would if I could, but I can't so I shan't...
-Original Message-
From: Remko Popma [mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:32 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: maven build for source does not work
Walter,
It
---
> From: Scott Deboy [mailto:scott.de...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 6:46 PM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: maven build for source does not work
>
> It is not true that we don't maintain 1.2 any longer. If important issues are
> found we may still
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
What? No maintenance on the latest released source?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Deboy [mailto:scott.de...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 6:46 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: maven build for source does not work
It is not true that we
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
What no maintenance on the latest RELEASED source?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Sicker [mailto:boa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 6:01 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: maven build for source does not work
We don't maintain 1.2.x an
Oh good point. We'll do security updates and such, but no more new features
or anything. It's in maintenance-only mode.
On 28 April 2014 18:46, Scott Deboy wrote:
> It is not true that we don't maintain 1.2 any longer. If important issues
> are found we may still address them even though we are
It is not true that we don't maintain 1.2 any longer. If important issues
are found we may still address them even though we are focused on Log4j2.
On Apr 28, 2014 4:01 PM, "Matt Sicker" wrote:
> We don't maintain 1.2.x anymore. Also, I think you're supposed to use ant
> to build 1.2.
>
> Please
We don't maintain 1.2.x anymore. Also, I think you're supposed to use ant
to build 1.2.
Please check out Log4j 2.0, though, as we're preparing to release that and
would like feedback.
On 28 April 2014 14:30, wrote:
> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
>
>
> 1) The pom file has to be updat
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
1) The pom file has to be updated to allow for maven-site-plugin 3.3
rather than 3.1
2) The mvm staging step gives a null pointer exception
Apache.log4j-1.2.17
Thanks
Walter
10 matches
Mail list logo