I would expect the Properties issue would affect all the implementations.
The enhancement you suggest would make the properties configuration different
than
the other configuration formats as they all require the Filters element. This
is yet another
example of why most (or all) of the log4j 2
Hi Ralph,
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 19:00, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The enhancement you suggest would make the properties configuration different
> than
> the other configuration formats as they all require the Filters element. This
> is yet another
> example of why most (or all) of the log4j 2 develop
> On Apr 3, 2022, at 11:59 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:.
>
> I would go even further, regarding the properties format: no Log4j2
> developer uses it and that explains why there are still many bugs in
> the `PropertiesConfiguration`.
Bugs?
When it was first implemented it followed a standa
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 21:53, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Bugs?
>
> When it was first implemented it followed a standard format (which should
> still work). Almost immediately folks started “simplifying” it since the
> standard
> format is cumbersome. But being cumbersome is not a bug.
>
> The biggest is
