LogHelper (wrapper) clarification.

2002-01-01 Thread Sonnathi, Venkat Ramana
Excuse me for the previous posting. Here's it is again with the updated subject. Hi Ceki, I was reading the manual on Log4J site. I could not understand the following warning under IBM Websphere section: Though the Redbook is undoubtedly motivated by the most noble intentions, I strongly

RE: how to redirect levels to different logs

2002-01-15 Thread Sonnathi, Venkat Ramana
1) what is the syntax to turn off appender additivity in a configuration file. Is the following correct? log4j.category.MyApp.additivity=false correct syntax is : log4j.additivity.MyApp = false -Original Message- From: Wilfred Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January

RE: Forced logging

2002-03-25 Thread Sonnathi, Venkat Ramana
FQCN should be the name of the wrapper class then you will get the correct results. Look at commons-logging module. Thanks, --Venkat. -Original Message- From: Bill Rebey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25,2002 2:24 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: Forced logging

Is there a MDC equivalent of NDC remove ?

2002-07-16 Thread Sonnathi, Venkat Ramana
Hi Log4j Gurus, Is there an equivalent of NDC.remove() for MDC? Thanks, --Venkat. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Is there a MDC equivalent of NDC remove ?

2002-07-16 Thread Sonnathi, Venkat Ramana
of NDC remove ? No. The MDC information will be released when thread exits. Is this not sufficient? -Mark -Original Message- From: Sonnathi, Venkat Ramana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:12 AM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: Is there a MDC equivalent