On 2013-11-05, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Having a general FRAMEWORK_X_Y define wouldn't be bad. But maybe
every
FRAMEWORK_X_Y should read as FRAMEWORK_X_Y_OR_ABOVE since
every framework
is compatible to its ancestors.
fine with me, I'll make the adjustments.
Awesome.
not yet done, but will
See https://builds.apache.org/job/log4net-trunk-tests/2/changes
Changes:
[bodewig] reduce redundancy in build files
--
[...truncated 522 lines...]
check-current-build-config:
-check-build-debug:
-check-build-defines:
-set-framework-configuration:
Glad you've been able to reproduce it, but I can't recall that I had a
firewall at all that could block me. But who knows - sometimes firewalls
behave more like invisiwalls. :-)
2013/11/5 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
woohoo!
On 2013-11-05, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
[nunit2]
See https://builds.apache.org/job/log4net-trunk-tests/3/changes
On 2013-11-05, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Glad you've been able to reproduce it, but I can't recall that I had a
firewall at all that could block me. But who knows - sometimes firewalls
behave more like invisiwalls. :-)
This is Jenkins, our CI now runs the tests (on .NET 4.0 for now).
Strange
Shouldn't be load related. When I ran into it I had absolutely nothing
running at the same time. But as I already found out last time: I was not
able to find out anything. :-D
2013/11/5 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
On 2013-11-05, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Glad you've been able to
