I've looked over the homepage, the SDK and checked the RAT report. If the binaries are fine, it looks good.
+1 >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] >Gesendet: Montag, 18. November 2013 06:22 >An: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org; gene...@logging.apache.org >Betreff: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3 > >Hi all, > >three times is a charm. :-) > >Changes over RC2 is a packaging change (the 3.5 assemblies now contain >the ILogExtensions) and two bug fixes. > >log4net 1.2.13 RC3 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net > (revision 3550) > >Details of changes since 1.2.12 are in the release notes: > http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/release/release- >notes.html > >I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. > >The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.13RC3 > (revision 1542676) > >Site: > http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/ > > (this is revision 887035 of > >https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/logging/content/lo >g4net/log4net-1.2.13) > >RAT Report: > http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/rat-report.html > >Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 0530 GMT 21-Nov >2013 > >[ ] +1 Release these artifacts >[ ] +0 OK, but... >[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >[ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > >Thanks! > > Stefan
