[GitHub] log4net pull request: [WIP] (LOG4NET-467) .NET Core support

2016-05-31 Thread StrangeWill
Github user StrangeWill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/log4net/pull/16 @bodewig _Hopefully_ there shouldn't be much flux between RC2 and Final (well at least we were told porting from RC2 -> Final won't be nearly as bad as RC1 -> RC2 was, and it wasn't

[GitHub] log4net pull request: [WIP] (LOG4NET-467) .NET Core support

2016-05-29 Thread bodewig
Github user bodewig commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/log4net/pull/16#issuecomment-222350005 Please note I'm just one voice others may think differently about this. Given the amount of flux that's going on I'm a bit reluctant to adapt to .NET Core before 1.0 is

[GitHub] log4net pull request: [WIP] (LOG4NET-467) .NET Core support

2016-05-27 Thread chlowell
Github user chlowell commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/log4net/pull/16#issuecomment-222199688 I have another branch on my fork (`dotnetcore-rc2`) which builds with RC2 tools, and has some improvements over the code here. A few tests are broken due to executing

[GitHub] log4net pull request: [WIP] (LOG4NET-467) .NET Core support

2016-05-27 Thread chester89
Github user chester89 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/log4net/pull/16#issuecomment-222102483 @chlowell any updates on this? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] log4net pull request: [WIP] (LOG4NET-467) .NET Core support

2015-12-10 Thread bodewig
Github user bodewig commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/log4net/pull/16#issuecomment-163839682 referenced in LOG4NET-467 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-467 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear