+1
I did the usual checks but due to a different OS I am not able to run
the tests (without lot of efforts :-)).
Please note, teh Apache Rat 0.10 looks a bit different than the one below.
Unapproved licenses:
log4net-1.2.12/log4net.snk.readme
log4net-1.2.12/tests/lib/prerequisites.txt
I
Hi all,
after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release.
log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
(revision 2850)
Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes:
: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
Hi all,
after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release.
log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
(revision 2850)
Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release
On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
I'm not checking the source changes but only website stuff etc. At a first
glance I found these issues on the web page:
* the download page is broken
I should have said so. Yes, this is to be expected as I must not run
CGIs from my homedir.
* the SDK
I forgot to explicitly add my own +1 to the release.
On 2013-09-09, Dominik Psenner wrote:
A minor gotcha I can see (on ubuntu at the moment) is, that the SDK TOC
on the left is only a few pixels high where it should probably use the
entire vertical space:
Maybe it's just a
