>> Having a general FRAMEWORK_X_Y define wouldn't be bad. But maybe
>every
>> FRAMEWORK_X_Y should read as "FRAMEWORK_X_Y_OR_ABOVE" since
>every framework
>> is compatible to its ancestors.
>
>fine with me, I'll make the adjustments.
Awesome.
>> Still I would keep these defines:
>
>> * MONO := se
Having a general FRAMEWORK_X_Y define wouldn't be bad. But maybe every
FRAMEWORK_X_Y should read as "FRAMEWORK_X_Y_OR_ABOVE" since every framework
is compatible to its ancestors. Still I would keep these defines:
* MONO := set when build for Mono
* MONO_X_Y := set when built for Mono
* DOTNET := s
