Re: Towards 2.0.6

2016-12-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2016-11-07, Dominik Psenner wrote: > LOG4NET-487 is about the configuration option and the issue I would > like to see in the release. The reason is, not having this > configurable costs performance and creating a mutex always is > troublesome to some configurations. The latter resulted in > LO

Re: Towards 2.0.6

2016-11-09 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 2016-11-09 10:11, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2016-11-07, Dominik Psenner wrote: LOG4NET-487 is about the configuration option and the issue I would like to see in the release. The reason is, not having this configurable costs performance and creating a mutex always is troublesome to some confi

Re: Towards 2.0.6

2016-11-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2016-11-07, Dominik Psenner wrote: > LOG4NET-487 is about the configuration option and the issue I would > like to see in the release. The reason is, not having this > configurable costs performance and creating a mutex always is > troublesome to some configurations. I should be able to carve

Re: Towards 2.0.6

2016-11-07 Thread Dominik Psenner
LOG4NET-487 is about the configuration option and the issue I would like to see in the release. The reason is, not having this configurable costs performance and creating a mutex always is troublesome to some configurations. The latter resulted in LOG4NET-506. LOG4NET-506 is a bug report that

Re: Towards 2.0.6

2016-11-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
So this would be something you'd like to see adressed before the release, right? I think this is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-485 which is linked by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-506 - only the later is still open. And there is https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

RE: Towards 2.0.6

2016-11-06 Thread Dominik Psenner
We had introduced a mutex to secure rolling operations in the rolling file appender. It would be nice if we could make the rolling locking configurable (none, lock, mutex), defaulting to none. There should be an issue for that, too. On 6 Nov 2016 2:19 p.m., "Joe" wrote: I just had a quick look t

RE: Towards 2.0.6

2016-11-06 Thread Joe
I just had a quick look through the commits since 1.2.15 and I don't see anything that looks particularly risky. I'd vote for cutting an RC. -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Sent: 06 November 2016 11:14 To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Toward