* Monday, July 30, 2012 4:40 AM
> *To:* Log4NET Dev
> *Subject:* Re: recommendation for AspNetPatternLayoutConverter
>
> ** **
>
> Yes, I completely discounted backwards compatibility, sorry.
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Dominik Psenner
> wrote:
>
x27;
Subject: RE: recommendation for AspNetPatternLayoutConverter
No need to worry George. :-) Personally I prefer to stay on the bleeding
edge of development. Though, this issue is currently not a problem to me.
Would you try and get something done that is backwards compatible? I will
commit an
[mailto:geo...@glympse.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:40 AM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: Re: recommendation for AspNetPatternLayoutConverter
Yes, I completely discounted backwards compatibility, sorry.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
On 07/27/2012 10:42 PM, George Chung
Yes, I completely discounted backwards compatibility, sorry.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 10:42 PM, George Chung wrote:
> > It currently defines this abstract method:
> >
> > protected abstract
> > void Convert(TextWriter writer, LoggingEvent loggingEve
On 07/27/2012 10:42 PM, George Chung wrote:
> It currently defines this abstract method:
>
> protected abstract
> void Convert(TextWriter writer, LoggingEvent loggingEvent, HttpContext
> httpContext)
>
> I would recommend changing it to:
>
> protected abstract void Convert(TextWriter writer, Lo
It currently defines this abstract method:
protected abstract void Convert(TextWriter writer, LoggingEvent
loggingEvent, HttpContext httpContext)
I would recommend changing it to:
protected abstract void Convert(TextWriter writer, LoggingEvent
loggingEvent, HttpContext*Base* httpContext)
Effe
