4.0 Runtime?

2010-05-03 Thread Roy Chastain
I would like to ask what issues people are seeing with the 4.0 runtime. I have done, admittedly, a less than exhaustive test and had no problems. -- Roy Chastain

RE: abandoned?

2010-05-03 Thread Roy Chastain
I would love to see a new release with the current code and all fixes/enhancements built-in. There are a couple of changes in the change database that I would like to have, but I have never been able to use the tools to apply them to the current codebase. After that is completed, a new 2.x releas

Martin Hutter/Switzerland/PAGO ist außer Haus.

2010-05-03 Thread martin . hutter
Ich werde ab 03.05.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 12.05.2010. I am currently not in the office. Wichtige Meldungen bitte an: Important Mails to: urs.kueh...@pago.ch

RE: abandoned?

2010-05-03 Thread Dominik Psenner
You're right. But for now I would leave out the generics. It is likely more urgent that log4net works with .NET 4.0 right now because a lot of people (like us) plan a UI rewrite with XAML in the next few months. I sense this as the main stream of .NET in the near future. > -Original Message---

Re: [jira] Created: (LOG4NET-257) Visual Studio 2010 .NET 4.0 Application does not copy log4net lib to bin directory

2010-05-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-05-03, Ron Grabowski wrote: > I just read that nant has a new release candidate out that supports > .NET 4.0. Someone may want to try running that against the code base > as that's how the final releases are built. I ran the beta1 on NAnt 0.90 against log4net's build file in the root dir

Re: abandoned?

2010-05-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-05-03, Dominik Psenner wrote: > But as long there are no breaking API changes needed to get log4net running > with .net4.0 I would not target it as a major release, but more or less a > 1.4.x. Ron talked about taking advantage of generics in the API which would be a breaking change. Oth

AW: abandoned?

2010-05-03 Thread Dominik Psenner
Good news that maybe something is moving on. My last note regarding .net 4.0 support was never answered and just resides somewhere in the history of February (see: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4net-dev/201002.mbox/%3C bc2abb510f3f405f9be041b89be06...@alpin.local%3e ). I agre