Hi,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
· the queue size should be configurable
+1
· the ThreadPool should be used in favour over a designated worker
Thread
no idea becuase I have no clue on .NET, but it sounds like fun :-)
·
Hi Christian,
thanks for the feedback.
· the ThreadPool should be used in favour over a designated
worker
Thread
no idea becuase I have no clue on .NET, but it sounds like fun :-)
It just means that it is not written as:
new Thread(() = { ..; Thread.Sleep(x); }
but rather there is
Dear log4net community,
it is my pleasure to inform you, Dominik has been elected as a new
committer to the project. He's been active around here for quite some
time and will now be able to work on the code base directly. I'm sure
the project is going to benefit a lot from him.
Welcome Dominik
On 2012-06-08, Dominik Psenner wrote:
In response to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-344?focusedCommentId=13291557
I would like to start a discussion how log4net should support
asynchronous logging. Tom Tang implemented a general async forwarding
appender that glues together
On 2012-06-08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
* the ThreadPool should be used in favour over a designated worker Thread
no idea becuase I have no clue on .NET, but it sounds like fun :-)
.Net has a built-in thread
Dear log4net community,
it is my pleasure to inform you, Dominik has been elected as a new
committer to the project. He's been active around here for quite some
time and will now be able to work on the code base directly. I'm sure
the project is going to benefit a lot from him.
Welcome Dominik
Welcome Dominik,
its good to have you on board. I wish you all the best for your work
here and hope you'll be around for a long time.
Usually we write a blog post on http://blogs.apache.org/logging/ when
somebody joins.
The last thing I have heard was there is a security issue with the
bloggins
