:kinnar_s...@persistent.co.in]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 2:30 PM
>> To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Issue with rolling based on date
>>
>>
>> Hi Douglas,
>> Sorry , my exmaple configuration does not having minimallock property
ogging.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Issue with rolling based on date
>
>
> Hi Douglas,
> Sorry , my exmaple configuration does not having minimallock property
> specified. But in my application, I am already using Minimallock property.
> But my main problem is that when rollin
gt;
>>
>>
>> Douglas E Wegscheid
>> 02/16/2011 02:48 PM
>> Please respond to
>> "Log4NET Dev"
>>
>>
>> To
>> "Log4NET Dev"
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> RE: Issue with rolling based on date
>>
ngly is a wrong note. A wrong note played
> with conviction is interpretation."
>
>
>
> Douglas E Wegscheid
> 02/16/2011 02:48 PM
> Please respond to
> "Log4NET Dev"
>
>
> To
> "Log4NET Dev"
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: Issue w
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback. If you see my rollingfileappender configuration,
then i am already using Minimallock setting. But my main problem is that
when rolling based on date happens, the size of new rolled file gets
generated out of original log file is very very small. I want a help in that
respond to
"Log4NET Dev"
To
"Log4NET Dev"
cc
Subject
RE: Issue with rolling based on date
it's in the log4j 1.2 FAQ:
24. How do I get multiple process to log to the same file?
-Kinnar Shah wrote: -
To: Dominik Psenner , 'Log4NET Dev'
F
it's in the log4j 1.2 FAQ: 24. How do I get multiple process to log to the same file? -Kinnar Shah wrote: -To: Dominik Psenner , 'Log4NET Dev' From: Kinnar Shah Date: 02/16/2011 08:06AMcc: Taraka Ravi , Yash Ganthe , Manish Gupta Subject: RE: Issue with rolling based on dateHi Dominik,Tha
6:20 PM
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
Cc: Kinnar Shah
Subject: RE: Issue with rolling based on date
It would be easier to log into different files for each process.
I didn't take a look at the source, but I believe that the rolling file
appender lacks a cross-process lock mutex due to performan
It would be easier to log into different files for each process.
I didn't take a look at the source, but I believe that the rolling file
appender lacks a cross-process lock mutex due to performance reasons (i.e.
on my computer it takes ~12ms to acquire a file based mutex).
> -Original Message
