On 2016-11-07, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> LOG4NET-487 is about the configuration option and the issue I would
> like to see in the release. The reason is, not having this
> configurable costs performance and creating a mutex always is
> troublesome to some configurations. The latter resulted in
>
On 2016-11-09 10:11, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2016-11-07, Dominik Psenner wrote:
LOG4NET-487 is about the configuration option and the issue I would
like to see in the release. The reason is, not having this
configurable costs performance and creating a mutex always is
troublesome to some
On 2016-11-07, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> LOG4NET-487 is about the configuration option and the issue I would
> like to see in the release. The reason is, not having this
> configurable costs performance and creating a mutex always is
> troublesome to some configurations.
I should be able to carve
t; Sent: 06 November 2016 11:14
> To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Towards 2.0.6
> Hi all
> I'd like to get 2.0.6 released in order to help out people who want to use
> log4net with .NET Core.
> We've had some changes since I built the last test assemblies, but AFAIK
&
il.com> wrote:
I just had a quick look through the commits since 1.2.15 and I don't see
anything that looks particularly risky.
I'd vote for cutting an RC.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 November 2016 11:14
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
: Towards 2.0.6
Hi all
I'd like to get 2.0.6 released in order to help out people who want to use
log4net with .NET Core.
We've had some changes since I built the last test assemblies, but AFAIK nobody
has given them a try anyway. I wonder whether creating test assemblies is worth
the effort
