.NET 4.0 support

2010-02-05 Thread Dominik Psenner
Greetings, first of all I would like to present myself as a new member of the log4net-devel mailing list. :-) And right away I start with my question. I issued the problem that log4net is not compatible with .NET 4.0 and as such I ask if this is going to change? So basically this mail should

AW: [jira] Updated: (LOG4NET-245) Need information on Exception Handling mechanism used in Log4Net project

2010-02-09 Thread Dominik Psenner
Good morning. What are you about to accomplish with that exception filter? I'm quite sure log4net internally has no exception filter installed as it would make no sense (at least it stands to reason for me). But I may also be on the wrong boat. And externally (i.e. by something like

AW: [jira] Updated: (LOG4NET-256) log4net With MDC is not exactly threadsafe?

2010-04-26 Thread Dominik Psenner
Good morning. As I understood your problem and the way log4net (and other log4*) works, a logger is identified by its name, which is passed into the LogManager.GetLogger(type) constructor delegator. Log4net then instantiates exactly this one logger and gives you back the instance in future calls.

RE: abandoned?

2010-05-03 Thread Dominik Psenner
- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:16 AM To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Re: abandoned? On 2010-05-03, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: But as long there are no breaking API changes needed to get log4net running

RE: My custome appender does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi. May you wanna try to instantiate the appender by code to see if the configuration is not used / wrong? I suspect that it can't find and instantiate your class by type=Alfaplan.Carola.Prototype.Logging.CustomeAppender. Greetings, d. -Original Message- From: Nadesh

RE: My custome appender does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
it in the xml file? Bye Dominik Psenner wrote: Hi. May you wanna try to instantiate the appender by code to see if the configuration is not used / wrong? I suspect that it can't find and instantiate your class by type=Alfaplan.Carola.Prototype.Logging.CustomeAppender

RE: My custome appender does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
. :-) -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:29 PM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: RE: My custome appender does not work You'll have to specify the assembly where it is contained. Usually this is the project name, but if you take a look

RE: My custome appender does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
depending on what we want to do ^^! Dominik Psenner wrote: Sorry, I was wrong in my previous mail. Just thought a little and then revisited one of the older projects of mine. The spacer is , instead of ;. So this will work: type=Alfaplan.Carola.Prototype.Logging.CustomeAppender

RE: Signed assemblies

2010-09-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
-processing.com www.future-processing.com --- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:56 AM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: RE: Signed assemblies Howdie, This nails down to the question: who's gonna pay

Re: Query Precision Pattern Converter

2010-10-09 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 10/08/2010 06:46 PM, Dave Nay wrote: To improve the accuracy of our log messages in log4net, I went looking for a method to improve the date stamp. I found that the NLog library has a formatter for adding a QueryPerformanceCounter to a log entry. Not wanting to switch logging libraries, I

Re: [jira] Updated: (LOG4NET-274) log4net doesn't log when running a .Net 4.0 Windows application built in Release mode

2010-10-29 Thread Dominik Psenner
This is a known problem that I already have mailed on the 5th february 2010 and was issued as LOG4NET-257 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-257). To quote Stefan Bodewig: ==quote== I ran the beta1 on NAnt 0.90 against log4net's build file in the root dir of trunk and it worked

RE: suggestion for Log4Net 1.2.10

2010-11-10 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, This is the exact same operation as the file mode does: FileMode fileOpenMode = m_append ? FileMode.Append : FileMode.Create; Hence this patch is completely useless. Parent directories are already created: if (!Directory.Exists(directoryFullName))

Re: Shared log4net config file for multiple programs

2010-12-28 Thread Dominik Psenner
for multiple programs Sent from the Log4net - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C                                       # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C  # ##

RE: Issue with rolling based on date

2011-02-16 Thread Dominik Psenner
It would be easier to log into different files for each process. I didn't take a look at the source, but I believe that the rolling file appender lacks a cross-process lock mutex due to performance reasons (i.e. on my computer it takes ~12ms to acquire a file based mutex). -Original

RE: Issue with rolling based on date

2011-02-17 Thread Dominik Psenner
? -Kinnar Shah kinnar_s...@persistent.co.in wrote: - To: Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com, 'Log4NET Dev' log4net-dev@logging.apache.org From: Kinnar Shah kinnar_s...@persistent.co.in Date: 02/16/2011 08:06AM cc: Taraka Ravi taraka.r...@navmanwireless.com, Yash Ganthe

RE: [jira] [Updated] (LOG4NET-290) Add Lambda-based ILog-Extensions (embedded log.IsEnabled)

2011-04-05 Thread Dominik Psenner
Did you compare runtime performance of the 'if syntax' versus the 'method invoke syntax'? -Original Message- From: Lars Corneliussen (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:00 AM To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Updated] (LOG4NET-290) Add

RE: Log4net Asynchronous Logging

2011-04-11 Thread Dominik Psenner
Howdie, would you please be more specific? What should be asynchronous? Greetings, D. -Original Message- From: anjansingh [mailto:mailan...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 7:35 AM To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Log4net Asynchronous Logging Hi All, Can

RE: Log4net Asynchronous Logging

2011-04-11 Thread Dominik Psenner
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: RE: Log4net Asynchronous Logging Thanks for yoyr reply. Actually I am going to build and application in ASP.NET that requires logging of exceptions in SQL Server. For that purpose I need to log exception details in database asynchronously. Dominik

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-12 Thread Dominik Psenner
to have write access to the original source and can still work versioned. If one keeps a strict linear history (no merges), one should also be able to push changes back to the svn repository. -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-12 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 08/12/2011 10:30 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote: On 08/12/2011 07:19 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Short term we'll be slowed down by the fact that there are only very few people with write access to the source tree, of course. Could the short term development be done in a remote repository

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-12 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 08/12/2011 10:46 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote: I actually just cloned the apache svn and am currently pushing the changes to a bitbucket repository here: https://bitbucket.org/NachbarsLumpi/log4net FWIW, I managed to apply some of the patches that were submitted into a fork of the just

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 08/13/2011 06:30 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: We do have a read-only git version at git://git.apache.org/log4net.git http://git.apache.org/log4net.git/ mirrored at github as well https://github.com/apache/log4net Didn't know that. :-) Since that repository is read-only, it is not exactly a

Discussing the existing patches

2011-08-13 Thread Dominik Psenner
Can we start a discussion on the existing patches? Primary targets of discussion are the ones I applied here: https://bitbucket.org/NachbarsLumpi/log4net-patches/ This includes the unresolved issues containing a patch file: * LOG4NET-190 * LOG4NET-108 * LOG4NET-270 -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi Stefan and Roy, sorry for the late response. This sunny sunday took me for a trip into the mountains. :-) See the inlines below. The normal state of an ASF project is that all people who contribute code on a regular basis have write access - if they want it. I would not advise to commit to

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
I forgot to say that this workflow works just great even for the time we have no write privileges on the SVN repository. The changesets will be stuck at log4net-crew, waiting there to be pushed to the svn repository. Best regards -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature

Re: Discussing the existing patches

2011-08-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
changeset: 554:200e5c7be470 tag: LOG4NET-190 tag: qbase tag: qtip tag: tip user:Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com date:Sun Aug 14 23:28:05 2011 +0200 summary: LOG4NET-190 changeset: 553:7f145743e63e tag: qparent user

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-15 Thread Dominik Psenner
. Please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C

Re: Client Profiles (was Re: Open issues for 1.2.10 release)

2011-08-15 Thread Dominik Psenner
to reproduce it with NAnt. Otherwise we don't even have to try, do we? -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C

Re: Client Profiles

2011-08-15 Thread Dominik Psenner
jenkins? There's continuum and buildbot. The latter runs on a win7 machine and therefore could be able to run msbuild. Btw, why does the nant build only produce mono files? -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C

Re: Moving forward with updates, builds and versions

2011-08-15 Thread Dominik Psenner
is not at ASF, but since patches should be sent to the mailing list Nope. JIRA. Then the medium to transfer a patch is JIRA and not the mailing list. Doesn't change much, does it? :-) -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C

RE: Planning 1.2.11

2011-08-18 Thread Dominik Psenner
I've managed to get NAnt 0.91apha2 working after some hassles, I hope to be able to build assemblies targeting 4.0 by tommorow. That's great news! I ran out of luck the last time I tried it, but I'm quite unused to NAnt anyway. So that could have been the reason. ;-) Best regards, D.

RE: Name for MutexLock?

2011-09-13 Thread Dominik Psenner
LOG4NET-164 introduced a new locking strategy for FileAppender which technically uses a System.Threading.Mutex with a name built from the log file's name. This should allow separate processes to share a log file without repeatedly opening and closing it. The main remaining issue is its name

RE: Name for MutexLock?

2011-09-13 Thread Dominik Psenner
Not only, it would also appear inside the config file in order to set the locking model of FileAppender like in the third example of http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/config-examples.html#fileappender Right now it would be lockingModel type=log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MutexLock / Quite

RE: Name for MutexLock?

2011-09-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
Remoting appender: If the application goes down that's finally persisting the log events, the logging is down too. InterProcessLock / MutexLock: Since every application persists the log events by itself, the logging survives as long as the application is alive. _ From: Ron

RE: Name for MutexLock?

2011-09-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
The RemotingAppender tries to flush all message in shutdown but if things go really bad you may be losing some messages, this is true. There can't be any guarantee anyway that all log messages are written before the application goes down. There are circumstances where the operating system takes

Re: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-19 Thread Dominik Psenner
of log4j philosophy. :-) -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C                                       # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C  # ##

RE: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-20 Thread Dominik Psenner
Grouping the properties that affect the rolling strategy and separating them from the others makes sense to me. It may be even a nice to implement it like that. This opens ways to something like this: rollFileConfiguration rollFileAndCondition rollFileCondition size=5MB /

RE: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-20 Thread Dominik Psenner
What you are suggesting is completely different from the current semantics. Until this email, I understood your example to be equivalent to a composite roll in the current implementation. In a composite roll, two different types of rolling take place. One on the date/time boundary and one on the

Re: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-20 Thread Dominik Psenner
to write down the API? It should be doable in a couple of hours and right now it looks like I have some free time tomorrow around 20°°-22°°. If so, is there somewhere a sandbox that I could use? -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C

Re: Dropping Support for .NET CF 1.0 and SSCLI 1.0 in log4net 1.2.11

2011-09-20 Thread Dominik Psenner
But we should probably remark in the README and at the download page that we could put some effort into providing the binaries if someone really needs them. -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C

RE: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-21 Thread Dominik Psenner
-Original Message- From: Roy Chastain [mailto:r...@roychastain.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:14 AM To: Log4NET Dev Subject: RE: New RollingFileAppender semantics Should I try to write down the API? It should be doable in a couple of hours and right now it looks like I have

RE: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-21 Thread Dominik Psenner
My current plan is to dummy up a new RFA (configuration points) and write the XML doc for the configuration points and pass the result of that out for review and comments. We must be explicit about the semantics of the new configuration. We have already observed cases where I have not correctly

Re: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-21 Thread Dominik Psenner
! -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C                                       # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C  # ##

RE: New RollingFileAppender semantics

2011-09-23 Thread Dominik Psenner
Take a look at org.apache.log4j.rolling.RollingFileAppender which has pluggable rolling and file naming strategies. http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/index.html For a little ancient history, log4j 1.2 has two classes named RollingFileAppender, the original in org.apache.log4j and a

Re: RFA-NG review

2011-09-30 Thread Dominik Psenner
, + Exact, + Remainder, + } + + #endregion /example Do you wanna try that? Do you know something better suited that maybe is part of JIRA? :-) -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C

RE: RFA-NG review

2011-10-04 Thread Dominik Psenner
Don't forget the böllern Fortunately we don't do that in the lower rhine area 8-) How comes that? The last time I've seen it was about a month ago. There they used flasks of gas having the length of half a meter. It could have easily been mistaken for an airstrike. *laughing* But, to tell you

RE: WebSite for 1.2.11 - Please Review

2011-10-06 Thread Dominik Psenner
At least it has now been proof-read by two Germans and at least one other non-native-speaker - Dominik said he was kind-of-German. :-) I believe that it's time to clear up some things. I was born in Italy and live there until here and now. Nevertheless, my mother tongue is German. Due to the fact

RE: ReviewBoard for log4net

2011-10-07 Thread Dominik Psenner
for anybody who wants to give it a try, there now is a ReviewBoard group at https://reviews.apache.org/groups/logging-log4net/ Nice! Unfortunately I won't be able to try this before Monday.

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1

2011-10-07 Thread Dominik Psenner
+1

RE: [jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-318) log4net doesn't pass verification

2011-12-02 Thread Dominik Psenner
FWIW, googling gave me this: http://www.mail-archive.com/mono-cecil@googlegroups.com/msg02926.html -Original Message- From: NN (Commented) (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:15 PM To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Commented]

RE: RollingFileAppender overwrites file if already rolled by another process

2011-12-28 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi Walden, The problem I'm seeing is that if another process has already rolled the file (assuming a locking model other than exclusive) then the second (and subsequent) process to perform the same roll will attempt to open the new file with a false for the append parm and thus overwrite

Re: Who owns the log4net nuget package?

2012-01-14 Thread Dominik Psenner
-- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C # ## signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Async logging

2012-06-08 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, In response to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-344?focusedCommentId=13291557 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-344?focusedCommentId=13291557 page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comme nt-13291557

RE: Async logging

2012-06-08 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi Christian, thanks for the feedback. · the ThreadPool should be used in favour over a designated worker Thread no idea becuase I have no clue on .NET, but it sounds like fun :-) It just means that it is not written as: new Thread(() = { ..; Thread.Sleep(x); } but rather there is

RE: Welcome Dominik Psenner as new Committer

2012-06-08 Thread Dominik Psenner
Dear log4net community, it is my pleasure to inform you, Dominik has been elected as a new committer to the project. He's been active around here for quite some time and will now be able to work on the code base directly. I'm sure the project is going to benefit a lot from him. Welcome Dominik

Re: recommendation for AspNetPatternLayoutConverter

2012-07-29 Thread Dominik Psenner
of the AspNetPatternLayoutConverter would suit the new usecase better? -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C

RE: recommendation for AspNetPatternLayoutConverter

2012-07-30 Thread Dominik Psenner
[mailto:geo...@glympse.com] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:40 AM To: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: recommendation for AspNetPatternLayoutConverter Yes, I completely discounted backwards compatibility, sorry. On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/27/2012 10:42

Re: database and string

2012-09-21 Thread Dominik Psenner
. Is there a string type that allows maxsize to be set. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/database-and-string-tp34458039p34458039.html Sent from the Log4net - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature

RE: log4net RollingLogFileAppender: is this possible to set limit for TOTAL size of all log files?

2012-09-25 Thread Dominik Psenner
If I set maximumFileSize=10MB and maxSizeRollBackups=10, I will get 10 files for a Day with total size 100MB. During the next day (Day+1) I will get another 10 files for the Day+1 with total size 100MB; the previous 10 files (ones for the Day) will NOT be removed when new files (for the Day+1)

RE: Log file are not written in IIS7

2012-10-03 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, Am using log4net in my application. It works fine when i run via code. But when i host it in IIS7 the log files are not written. What is the preferred account used to write to the log file directory, I tried network and network service and they did not work. I tried iusr and that worked .

RE: Object Reference issue in changing the Log file name dynamically in threads

2012-10-03 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, Am creating a web application using Vb.Net for data processing. I am implementing multi threading in processing functions. And also i used log4net to log the function calls and steps. This is not going to work like this. The log4net-way is by defining different appenders and filter the

RE: Object Reference issue in changing the Log file name dynamically in threads

2012-10-03 Thread Dominik Psenner
This Works fine Glad to hear that. .. i am unable to use static appenders. Because i need to change the name of the log file based on my processing function in my application. I can understand your problem. Unfortunately there is no easy way to change the logfile dynamically at runtime. It all

RE: Log file are not written in IIS7

2012-10-04 Thread Dominik Psenner
what is the use of this property.. If i set this what are all the permissions i need to set for the log folder in iis. I assumed that you configured log4net to log to a file to which IIS has no permissions to write to. Thus you have to give IIS either the permissions or impersonate the web

Re: [jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-178) Log4Net stops logging after appdomain recycle of aps.net2.0 application

2012-10-27 Thread Dominik Psenner
. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Dominik Psenner (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13484745#comment-13484745 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-178

Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-27 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, I gotta question about adding a new FAQ entry. I don't know how the build system works behind the scenes but I believe it should be enough to update: src\site\xdoc\release\faq.xml and commit. The website should then update itself, doesn't it? Cheers, D.

FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-27 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, Yesterday I posted this message on log4net-dev but maybe noone noticed. :-) Is there someone around that knows how the publishing of the log4net website works? Cheers, D. -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:19 PM

RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-27 Thread Dominik Psenner
into the website svn directory hth Cheers Christian On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yesterday I posted this message on log4net-dev but maybe noone noticed. :-) Is there someone around that knows how the publishing of the log4net website works? Cheers, D

RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-28 Thread Dominik Psenner
: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:49 AM To: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry Cool, and thanks for updating the site! Good to see you are still there :-) On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning Christian, thanks for the fast feedback

RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-28 Thread Dominik Psenner
Can you check your maven version? There was a change between 2 and 3. Maybe its related to that. mvn --version Apache Maven 3.0.3 I found out that the menu ref=reports/-snippet triggers mvn to generate the projec documentation. But nonetheless mvn behaves really odd. When I build it first I

RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-28 Thread Dominik Psenner
of \r\n line endings? Will the site automatically be updated once I commit the updated site? -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 11:07 AM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry Can you check your maven

RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-28 Thread Dominik Psenner
*hm* .. using maven 2.2.1 it seems to work flawlessly. At least it does not produce warnings. ;-) I checked the site and mostly only the dates are changed now. *yay!* mvn 2 + 3 do need different things in the reporting section. Maybe we (you? ;-)) should look into migrating to m3 for log4net

RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-29 Thread Dominik Psenner
That inconsistent line ending seems to be a problem with the eol-style:native on my tortoisesvn client versioned as: TortoiseSVN 1.7.10 Subversion 1.7.7 That svn client kept modifying half of all EOL in the files to windows format and the other half to unix format while preparing to send the

RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry

2012-11-29 Thread Dominik Psenner
*hm* .. using maven 2.2.1 it seems to work flawlessly. At least it does not produce warnings. ;-) I checked the site and mostly only the dates are changed now. *yay!* [Sorry for being almost totally absent, and not only here. Currently I have no idea when this will change.] Welcome back

RE: Newbie - can't get anything to show in the log

2012-12-17 Thread Dominik Psenner
This is the developers list. Please ask questions in the users mailing list [1]. Also note that there are also several answers listed in the FAQ ([2] and [3]) that probably solve your problem. Cheers, D. [1] log4net-u...@logging.apache.org [2]

RE: Newbie - can't get anything to show in the log

2012-12-17 Thread Dominik Psenner
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:08 PM, skifreak skifreak...@gmail.com wrote: I am a developer :) :-) *laughing* I love these kind of emails.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-83) Allow flushing into file every X milliseconds

2013-01-12 Thread Dominik Psenner
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature # # Key ID: B469318C # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C # ##

Re: [jira] [Created] (LOG4NET-366) log4NET DCOM registration not working

2013-01-16 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 01/16/2013 05:39 PM, Johnson, Thomas wrote: Anything in the event log? Did you build log4net as 64 bit assembly or x86? -Original Message- From: Chirag Chandani (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 6:34 AM To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject:

[PATCH 0 of 5 ] LOG4NET-27: Hans Meiers RFA patches

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
I pasted the patched files into a series of patches and bomb them to the mailing list for eassier review.

[PATCH 1 of 5] Step 1: refactoring

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
Trivial changes to tabs and spaces, formatting etc. diff -r b430bc3cc0f4 -r dc18d71a5304 src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs --- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:27:20 2013 +0100 +++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:05 2013 +0100 @@ -1,10 +1,10

[PATCH 2 of 5] Step 2: bugfix

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
In RollOverIfDateBoundaryCrossing preserveLogFileExtension wasn't respected. diff -r dc18d71a5304 -r 76c5f9136b8f src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs --- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:05 2013 +0100 +++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:24

[PATCH 3 of 5] Step 3: modifications without affecting existing code

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
* some trivial changes in visibility, regions etc. * additional functions, properties, members that aren't yet used from existing code. * NextCheckDate - GetRollDateTimeRelative: Function works identically if called with relativePeriod==1. Existing code does this. Additionally any count of

[PATCH 4 of 5] Step 4: use the new functionality

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
diff -r 569e06c6cfb3 -r c4b727dc790c src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs --- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:43 2013 +0100 +++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58 2013 +0100 @@ -835,6 +835,11 @@ }

[PATCH 5 of 5] Step 5: tests

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
diff -r c4b727dc790c -r 09c42c61e2db tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs --- a/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58 2013 +0100 +++ b/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:37:21 2013 +0100 @@ -1874,12 +1874,110 @@

RE: [PATCH 1 of 5] Step 1: refactoring

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
Quite a large patch, but looks sensible. -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:41 PM To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: [PATCH 1 of 5] Step 1: refactoring Trivial changes to tabs and spaces, formatting etc. diff

Re: [PATCH 2 of 5] Step 2: bugfix

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
What are the effects of this bug? It is not yet reported as an issue, is it? On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote: In RollOverIfDateBoundaryCrossing preserveLogFileExtension wasn't respected. diff -r dc18d71a5304 -r 76c5f9136b8f src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs --- a/src/Appender

Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] Step 5: tests

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote: diff -r c4b727dc790c -r 09c42c61e2db tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs --- a/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58 2013 +0100 +++ b/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:37:21

Re: [PATCH 4 of 5] Step 4: use the new functionality

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote: diff -r 569e06c6cfb3 -r c4b727dc790c src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs --- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:43 2013 +0100 +++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58 2013 +0100 @@ -835,6 +835,11

RE: Re: [PATCH 2 of 5] Step 2: bugfix

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
CombinePath to always correctly consider the setting of preserveLogFileNameExtension simply overlooked this one occurrence of file name combining. AFAIK this hasn't been reported yet. What are the effects of this bug? It is not yet reported as an issue, is it? On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik

RE: [PATCH 1 of 5] Step 1: refactoring

2013-01-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
Do you expect any response from other devs? No. In case you do, we practice CTR (Commit then review). If you are happy with the patches, then just apply them to the code. If you are not happy / in doubt, get to the ML. No need to wait for a second confirmation :-) I'm expecting feedback from

Nightly builds

2013-02-26 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi there, Andrew Arnott posted that he is interested in nightly builds of log4net. Therefore I am hereby raising a poll to see if also the community is interested. Please post back with your opinion by placing a cross and optionally a small comment. Just like this: -- DUMMY -- [ ] Yes [X] No,

RE: Nightly builds

2013-02-26 Thread Dominik Psenner
Argh, I forgot to say when the poll ends, sorry. You have 7 days starting from: NOW! :-) This means that the poll ends on the 5th of March at 12:00 UTC. -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:12 AM To: 'Log4NET User

RE: Nightly builds

2013-03-06 Thread Dominik Psenner
have no opinion in this specific case, but in general I like them. My 2 cents - Cheers Christian On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, the poll ended some hour ago and I wanted to give it a little more time. But unfortunately that did not help

AW: log4net.dll version 1.2.10.0 (FileSystemWatcher objects)

2013-05-24 Thread Dominik Psenner
Good morning Yuvraj, There's no way of being sure unless you have tried it out with your application or a sample application that uses log4net in the same way you do. Of course a sample application could do things faster than normal and in an automated way so that the problem happens sooner

AW: IslevelEnabled

2013-06-07 Thread Dominik Psenner
So you are preventing events from getting into the logging hierarchy. Not a bad idea. Why did you not use an IFilter in an appender? It can be modified at runtime using the methods AddFilter() and ClearFilters(). Cheers Von: Howe, Peter L [mailto:ph...@paychex.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag,

Re: log4net not reading all of app.config file

2013-06-24 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi Peter, very strange problem indeed. Have you tried loading the configuration from a separate config file (XmlConfigurator.Configure(file))? Have you tried to output something on the Console right nearby the log4net logging calls to check whether your program really generates logging

AW: log4net not reading all of app.config file

2013-06-25 Thread Dominik Psenner
in the back of my mind. Thanks again! Peter From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 2:48 PM To: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: log4net not reading all of app.config file Hi Peter, very strange problem indeed. Have you tried loading the configuration

AW: log4net not reading all of app.config file

2013-06-28 Thread Dominik Psenner
directive. Now it loads properly without an explicit call to XMLConfigurator. Peter From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:29 AM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: AW: log4net not reading all of app.config file Good morning Peter, I'm happy you were able

AW: What is the planned release date for version 1.2.12?

2013-07-24 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, The schedule is that it will be released when it's done. According to JIRA these two issues are still unresolved: * LOG4NET-342 Could be fixed with documentation (i.e. by modifying the FAQ on the website). * LOG4NET-367 There's a patch at

AW: File naming

2013-07-24 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi, try different configurations for each instance. Unfortunately currently there's no way to configure the rolling file appender so that it encodes the process id in the filename. Feel free to open an issue if the multiple configurations-workaround is not a solution for you. Please consider

AW: What is the planned release date for version 1.2.12?

2013-07-25 Thread Dominik Psenner
The answer is short: JIRA Von: d_k [mailto:mail...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013 17:51 An: Log4NET Dev Betreff: Re: What is the planned release date for version 1.2.12? Fair enough. Where can I find out what needs to be done? On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Dominik

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >