Greetings,
first of all I would like to present myself as a new member of the
log4net-devel mailing list. :-) And right away I start with my question.
I issued the problem that log4net is not compatible with .NET 4.0 and as
such I ask if this is going to change?
So basically this mail should
Good morning.
What are you about to accomplish with that exception filter?
I'm quite sure log4net internally has no exception filter installed as it
would make no sense (at least it stands to reason for me). But I may also be
on the wrong boat.
And externally (i.e. by something like
Good morning.
As I understood your problem and the way log4net (and other log4*) works, a
logger is identified by its name, which is passed into the
LogManager.GetLogger(type) constructor delegator. Log4net then instantiates
exactly this one logger and gives you back the instance in future calls.
-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:16 AM
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: abandoned?
On 2010-05-03, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
But as long there are no breaking API changes needed to get log4net
running
Hi.
May you wanna try to instantiate the appender by code to see if the
configuration is not used / wrong? I suspect that it can't find and
instantiate your class by
type=Alfaplan.Carola.Prototype.Logging.CustomeAppender.
Greetings,
d.
-Original Message-
From: Nadesh
it in the xml file?
Bye
Dominik Psenner wrote:
Hi.
May you wanna try to instantiate the appender by code to see if the
configuration is not used / wrong? I suspect that it can't find and
instantiate your class by
type=Alfaplan.Carola.Prototype.Logging.CustomeAppender
. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:29 PM
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
Subject: RE: My custome appender does not work
You'll have to specify the assembly where it is contained. Usually this is
the project name, but if you take a look
depending on what we
want
to do ^^!
Dominik Psenner wrote:
Sorry, I was wrong in my previous mail. Just thought a little and then
revisited one of the older projects of mine. The spacer is , instead of
;.
So this will work:
type=Alfaplan.Carola.Prototype.Logging.CustomeAppender
-processing.com www.future-processing.com
---
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:56 AM
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
Subject: RE: Signed assemblies
Howdie,
This nails down to the question: who's gonna pay
On 10/08/2010 06:46 PM, Dave Nay wrote:
To improve the accuracy of our log messages in log4net, I went looking
for a method to improve the date stamp. I found that the NLog library
has a formatter for adding a QueryPerformanceCounter to a log entry.
Not wanting to switch logging libraries, I
This is a known problem that I already have mailed on the 5th february
2010 and was issued as LOG4NET-257
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-257). To quote Stefan
Bodewig:
==quote==
I ran the beta1 on NAnt 0.90 against log4net's build file in the root
dir of trunk and it worked
Hi,
This is the exact same operation as the file mode does:
FileMode fileOpenMode = m_append ? FileMode.Append : FileMode.Create;
Hence this patch is completely useless. Parent directories are already
created:
if (!Directory.Exists(directoryFullName))
for multiple
programs
Sent from the Log4net - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C #
##
It would be easier to log into different files for each process.
I didn't take a look at the source, but I believe that the rolling file
appender lacks a cross-process lock mutex due to performance reasons (i.e.
on my computer it takes ~12ms to acquire a file based mutex).
-Original
Did you compare runtime performance of the 'if syntax' versus the 'method
invoke syntax'?
-Original Message-
From: Lars Corneliussen (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:00 AM
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (LOG4NET-290) Add
Howdie,
would you please be more specific? What should be asynchronous?
Greetings,
D.
-Original Message-
From: anjansingh [mailto:mailan...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 7:35 AM
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: Log4net Asynchronous Logging
Hi All,
Can
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: RE: Log4net Asynchronous Logging
Thanks for yoyr reply. Actually I am going to build and application in
ASP.NET that requires logging of exceptions in SQL Server. For that
purpose
I need to log exception details in database asynchronously.
Dominik
to have write access
to the original source and can still work versioned. If one keeps a
strict linear history (no merges), one should also be able to push
changes back to the svn repository.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
On 08/12/2011 10:30 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
On 08/12/2011 07:19 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Short term we'll be slowed down by the fact that there are only very few
people with write access to the source tree, of course.
Could the short term development be done in a remote repository
On 08/12/2011 10:46 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
I actually just cloned the apache svn and am currently pushing the
changes to a bitbucket repository here:
https://bitbucket.org/NachbarsLumpi/log4net
FWIW, I managed to apply some of the patches that were submitted into a
fork of the just
On 08/13/2011 06:30 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
We do have a read-only git version at git://git.apache.org/log4net.git
http://git.apache.org/log4net.git/ mirrored at github as well
https://github.com/apache/log4net
Didn't know that. :-) Since that repository is read-only, it is not
exactly a
Can we start a discussion on the existing patches? Primary targets of
discussion are the ones I applied here:
https://bitbucket.org/NachbarsLumpi/log4net-patches/
This includes the unresolved issues containing a patch file:
* LOG4NET-190
* LOG4NET-108
* LOG4NET-270
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP
Hi Stefan and Roy,
sorry for the late response. This sunny sunday took me for a trip into
the mountains. :-) See the inlines below.
The normal state of an ASF project is that all people who contribute
code on a regular basis have write access - if they want it.
I would not advise to commit to
I forgot to say that this workflow works just great even for the time we
have no write privileges on the SVN repository. The changesets will be
stuck at log4net-crew, waiting there to be pushed to the svn repository.
Best regards
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature
changeset: 554:200e5c7be470
tag: LOG4NET-190
tag: qbase
tag: qtip
tag: tip
user:Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
date:Sun Aug 14 23:28:05 2011 +0200
summary: LOG4NET-190
changeset: 553:7f145743e63e
tag: qparent
user
.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C
to reproduce it with NAnt. Otherwise we don't even
have to try, do we?
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C
jenkins? There's continuum and buildbot. The
latter runs on a win7 machine and therefore could be able to run msbuild.
Btw, why does the nant build only produce mono files?
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
is not at ASF, but since
patches should be sent to the mailing list
Nope. JIRA.
Then the medium to transfer a patch is JIRA and not the mailing list.
Doesn't change much, does it? :-)
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
I've managed to get NAnt 0.91apha2 working after some hassles, I hope to
be able to build assemblies targeting 4.0 by tommorow.
That's great news! I ran out of luck the last time I tried it, but I'm quite
unused to NAnt anyway. So that could have been the reason. ;-)
Best regards,
D.
LOG4NET-164 introduced a new locking strategy for FileAppender which
technically uses a System.Threading.Mutex with a name built from the log
file's name. This should allow separate processes to share a log file
without repeatedly opening and closing it.
The main remaining issue is its name
Not only, it would also appear inside the config file in order to set
the locking model of FileAppender like in the third example of
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/config-examples.html#fileappender
Right now it would be
lockingModel type=log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MutexLock /
Quite
Remoting appender:
If the application goes down that's finally persisting the log events, the
logging is down too.
InterProcessLock / MutexLock:
Since every application persists the log events by itself, the logging
survives as long as the application is alive.
_
From: Ron
Grouping the properties that affect the rolling strategy and separating
them from the others makes sense to me.
It may be even a nice to implement it like that. This opens ways to
something like this:
rollFileConfiguration
rollFileAndCondition
rollFileCondition size=5MB /
What you are suggesting is completely different from the current
semantics.
Until this email, I understood your example to be equivalent to a
composite roll in the current implementation. In a composite roll, two
different types of rolling take place. One on the date/time boundary
and one on the
to write down the API? It should be doable in a couple of
hours and right now it looks like I have some free time tomorrow around
20°°-22°°. If so, is there somewhere a sandbox that I could use?
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
But we should probably remark in the README and at the download page
that we could put some effort into providing the binaries if someone
really needs them.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
-Original Message-
From: Roy Chastain [mailto:r...@roychastain.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:14 AM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: RE: New RollingFileAppender semantics
Should I try to write down the API? It should be doable in a couple of
hours and
right now it looks like I have
!
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C #
##
Take a look at org.apache.log4j.rolling.RollingFileAppender which has
pluggable rolling and file naming strategies.
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/index.html
For a little ancient history, log4j 1.2 has two classes named
RollingFileAppender, the original in org.apache.log4j and a
,
+ Exact,
+ Remainder,
+ }
+
+ #endregion
/example
Do you wanna try that? Do you know something better suited that maybe is
part of JIRA? :-)
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
At least it has now been proof-read by two Germans and at least one
other non-native-speaker - Dominik said he was kind-of-German.
:-) I believe that it's time to clear up some things. I was born in Italy
and live there until here and now. Nevertheless, my mother tongue is German.
Due to the fact
for anybody who wants to give it a try, there now is a ReviewBoard group
at https://reviews.apache.org/groups/logging-log4net/
Nice! Unfortunately I won't be able to try this before Monday.
+1
FWIW, googling gave me this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mono-cecil@googlegroups.com/msg02926.html
-Original Message-
From: NN (Commented) (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:15 PM
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Commented]
Hi Walden,
The problem I'm seeing is that if another process has already rolled the
file (assuming a locking model other than exclusive) then the second (and
subsequent) process to perform the same roll will attempt to open the new
file with a false for the append parm and thus overwrite
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C #
##
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi Christian,
thanks for the feedback.
· the ThreadPool should be used in favour over a designated
worker
Thread
no idea becuase I have no clue on .NET, but it sounds like fun :-)
It just means that it is not written as:
new Thread(() = { ..; Thread.Sleep(x); }
but rather there is
Dear log4net community,
it is my pleasure to inform you, Dominik has been elected as a new
committer to the project. He's been active around here for quite some
time and will now be able to work on the code base directly. I'm sure
the project is going to benefit a lot from him.
Welcome Dominik
of the AspNetPatternLayoutConverter would suit
the new usecase better?
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C
[mailto:geo...@glympse.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:40 AM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: Re: recommendation for AspNetPatternLayoutConverter
Yes, I completely discounted backwards compatibility, sorry.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/27/2012 10:42
.
Is there a string type that allows maxsize to be set.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/database-and-string-tp34458039p34458039.html
Sent from the Log4net - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature
If I set
maximumFileSize=10MB and maxSizeRollBackups=10, I will get 10 files for a
Day with total size 100MB. During the next day (Day+1) I will get
another 10 files for the Day+1 with total size 100MB; the previous 10
files (ones for the Day) will NOT be removed when new files (for the
Day+1)
Hi,
Am using log4net in my application. It works fine when i run via code. But
when i host it in IIS7 the log files are not written.
What is the preferred account used to write to the log file directory, I
tried network and network service and they did not work. I tried iusr and
that worked .
Hi,
Am creating a web application using Vb.Net for data processing. I am
implementing multi threading in processing functions. And also i used
log4net to log the function calls and steps.
This is not going to work like this. The log4net-way is by defining
different appenders and filter the
This Works fine
Glad to hear that.
.. i am unable to use static appenders. Because i need to
change the name of the log file based on my processing function in my
application.
I can understand your problem. Unfortunately there is no easy way to change
the logfile dynamically at runtime. It all
what is the use of this property.. If i set this what are all the
permissions
i need to set for the log folder in iis.
I assumed that you configured log4net to log to a file to which IIS has no
permissions to write to. Thus you have to give IIS either the permissions or
impersonate the web
.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Dominik Psenner (JIRA) j...@apache.org
wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13484745#comment-13484745
]
Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-178
Hi,
I gotta question about adding a new FAQ entry. I don't know how the build
system works behind the scenes but I believe it should be enough to update:
src\site\xdoc\release\faq.xml
and commit. The website should then update itself, doesn't it?
Cheers,
D.
Hi,
Yesterday I posted this message on log4net-dev but maybe noone noticed. :-)
Is there someone around that knows how the publishing of the log4net website
works?
Cheers,
D.
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:19 PM
into the website svn directory
hth
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I posted this message on log4net-dev but maybe noone noticed.
:-)
Is there someone around that knows how the publishing of the log4net
website
works?
Cheers,
D
: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:49 AM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry
Cool, and thanks for updating the site!
Good to see you are still there :-)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Good morning Christian,
thanks for the fast feedback
Can you check your maven version? There was a change between 2 and 3.
Maybe its related to that.
mvn --version
Apache Maven 3.0.3
I found out that the menu ref=reports/-snippet triggers mvn to generate
the projec documentation. But nonetheless mvn behaves really odd.
When I build it first I
of \r\n line endings?
Will the site automatically be updated once I commit the updated site?
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 11:07 AM
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
Subject: RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry
Can you check your maven
*hm* .. using maven 2.2.1 it seems to work flawlessly. At least it does
not
produce warnings. ;-) I checked the site and mostly only the dates are
changed now. *yay!*
mvn 2 + 3 do need different things in the reporting section. Maybe we
(you? ;-)) should look into migrating to m3 for log4net
That inconsistent line ending seems to be a problem with the
eol-style:native on my tortoisesvn client versioned as:
TortoiseSVN 1.7.10
Subversion 1.7.7
That svn client kept modifying half of all EOL in the files to windows
format and the other half to unix format while preparing to send the
*hm* .. using maven 2.2.1 it seems to work flawlessly. At least it does
not
produce warnings. ;-) I checked the site and mostly only the dates are
changed now. *yay!*
[Sorry for being almost totally absent, and not only here. Currently I
have no idea when this will change.]
Welcome back
This is the developers list. Please ask questions in the users mailing list
[1].
Also note that there are also several answers listed in the FAQ ([2] and
[3]) that probably solve your problem.
Cheers,
D.
[1] log4net-u...@logging.apache.org
[2]
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:08 PM, skifreak skifreak...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a developer :)
:-)
*laughing* I love these kind of emails.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C #
##
I pasted the patched files into a series of patches and bomb them to the
mailing list for eassier review.
Trivial changes to tabs and spaces, formatting etc.
diff -r b430bc3cc0f4 -r dc18d71a5304 src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs
--- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:27:20 2013 +0100
+++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:05 2013 +0100
@@ -1,10 +1,10
In RollOverIfDateBoundaryCrossing preserveLogFileExtension wasn't respected.
diff -r dc18d71a5304 -r 76c5f9136b8f src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs
--- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:05 2013 +0100
+++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:24
* some trivial changes in visibility, regions etc.
* additional functions, properties, members that aren't yet used from existing
code.
* NextCheckDate - GetRollDateTimeRelative:
Function works identically if called with relativePeriod==1. Existing code
does this.
Additionally any count of
diff -r 569e06c6cfb3 -r c4b727dc790c src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs
--- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:43 2013 +0100
+++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58 2013 +0100
@@ -835,6 +835,11 @@
}
diff -r c4b727dc790c -r 09c42c61e2db
tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs
--- a/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58
2013 +0100
+++ b/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:37:21
2013 +0100
@@ -1874,12 +1874,110 @@
Quite a large patch, but looks sensible.
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:41 PM
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: [PATCH 1 of 5] Step 1: refactoring
Trivial changes to tabs and spaces, formatting etc.
diff
What are the effects of this bug? It is not yet reported as an issue, is it?
On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
In RollOverIfDateBoundaryCrossing preserveLogFileExtension wasn't respected.
diff -r dc18d71a5304 -r 76c5f9136b8f src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs
--- a/src/Appender
On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
diff -r c4b727dc790c -r 09c42c61e2db
tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs
--- a/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58
2013 +0100
+++ b/tests/src/Appender/RollingFileAppenderTest.cs Tue Jan 22 14:37:21
On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote:
diff -r 569e06c6cfb3 -r c4b727dc790c src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs
--- a/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:43 2013 +0100
+++ b/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs Tue Jan 22 14:31:58 2013 +0100
@@ -835,6 +835,11
CombinePath to always
correctly consider the setting of preserveLogFileNameExtension simply
overlooked this one
occurrence of file name combining.
AFAIK this hasn't been reported yet.
What are the effects of this bug? It is not yet reported as an issue, is it?
On 01/22/2013 02:41 PM, Dominik
Do you expect any response from other devs?
No.
In case you do, we practice CTR (Commit then review). If you are happy
with the patches, then just apply them to the code. If you are not
happy / in doubt, get to the ML. No need to wait for a second
confirmation :-)
I'm expecting feedback from
Hi there,
Andrew Arnott posted that he is interested in nightly builds of log4net.
Therefore I am hereby raising a poll to see if also the
community is interested. Please post back with your opinion by placing a cross
and optionally a small comment. Just like this:
-- DUMMY --
[ ] Yes
[X] No,
Argh, I forgot to say when the poll ends, sorry. You have 7 days starting from:
NOW! :-) This means that the poll ends on the 5th of
March at 12:00 UTC.
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:12 AM
To: 'Log4NET User
have no
opinion in this specific case, but in general I like them.
My 2 cents -
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
the poll ended some hour ago and I wanted to give it a little more time. But
unfortunately that
did not help
Good morning Yuvraj,
There's no way of being sure unless you have tried it out with your
application or a sample application that uses log4net in the same way you
do. Of course a sample application could do things faster than normal and in
an automated way so that the problem happens sooner
So you are preventing events from getting into the logging hierarchy. Not a
bad idea. Why did you not use an IFilter in an appender? It can be modified
at runtime using the methods AddFilter() and ClearFilters().
Cheers
Von: Howe, Peter L [mailto:ph...@paychex.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag,
Hi Peter,
very strange problem indeed. Have you tried loading the configuration
from a separate config file (XmlConfigurator.Configure(file))? Have you
tried to output something on the Console right nearby the log4net
logging calls to check whether your program really generates logging
in the back of my mind. Thanks again!
Peter
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 2:48 PM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: Re: log4net not reading all of app.config file
Hi Peter,
very strange problem indeed. Have you tried loading the configuration
directive. Now it loads properly without an explicit call to
XMLConfigurator.
Peter
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:29 AM
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
Subject: AW: log4net not reading all of app.config file
Good morning Peter,
I'm happy you were able
Hi,
The schedule is that it will be released when it's done.
According to JIRA these two issues are still unresolved:
* LOG4NET-342
Could be fixed with documentation (i.e. by modifying the FAQ on the
website).
* LOG4NET-367
There's a patch at
Hi,
try different configurations for each instance. Unfortunately currently
there's no way to configure the rolling file appender so that it encodes the
process id in the filename. Feel free to open an issue if the multiple
configurations-workaround is not a solution for you. Please consider
The answer is short: JIRA
Von: d_k [mailto:mail...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013 17:51
An: Log4NET Dev
Betreff: Re: What is the planned release date for version 1.2.12?
Fair enough.
Where can I find out what needs to be done?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Dominik
And I am getting a separate file for each execution of the program:
3268-_20130724_MyApplication.log
5844-_20130724_MyApplication.log
10460-_20130724_MyApplication.log
I tried some tricks to get the date component first for easier sorting, but
no luck.
Peter
From: Dominik
I'm not sure if the listing of the API documentation is complete:
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/sdk/log4net.Layout.PatternLayout.h
tml
But you could still read up all patterns in the static PatternLayout
constructor where the HashTable s_globalRulesRegistry is populated.
find it myself, but thanks.
Peter
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:34 AM
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
Subject: AW: Layout entities
I'm not sure if the listing of the API documentation is complete:
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/sdk
I may be pointing out the obvious, but why don't you let both
applications write to the same key a collection which lets your third
application determine which fields are being sent:
string[] fields = Properties[fields];
foreach(string field in fields) {
string value = Properties[field];
}
. (Do you know if there is a
method I could use to read the configuration dynamically? I can just write
the code to do it from scratch, but if something already exists then I’d
rather leverage that.
** **
Thanks,
** **
Linda
** **
*From:* Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen
The last few lines indicate a windows 7 security related issue with
nant. I've run into this a few time and there's already an answer on
stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8605122/how-do-i-resolve-configuration-errors-with-nant-0-91
And yes, believe it or not, on windows 7 you
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. August 2013 07:57
An: Log4NET Dev
Betreff: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: log4net-trunk-build #1
On 2013-08-01, Dominik Psenner wrote:
The last few lines indicate a windows 7 security related
1 - 100 of 845 matches
Mail list logo
