ose();
> }
> }
>
> I think new log entries can not be added to the top of file.
> Radovan Raszka
>
> -Původní zpráva-
> Od: xalex [mailto:a...@pixafe.com]
> Odesláno: 23. července 2009 17:44
> Komu: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Předmět: Re: Wra
x [mailto:a...@pixafe.com]
Odesláno: 23. července 2009 17:44
Komu: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Předmět: Re: Wrapping Log4Net
Hi,
i did not find it in the documentation:
Is it possible to configure appenders by coding without configfiles?
How do i get the appenders which are currently configured? I
Hi,
i did not find it in the documentation:
Is it possible to configure appenders by coding without configfiles?
How do i get the appenders which are currently configured? I would like to
change the output destination file of a FileAppender.
And last question: is it possible to configure a FileAp
Hi,
first of all thanks to all the interesting input!
I want to clearify my requirements and intentions:
- the exchange of log4net is not really planned, it should be only possible
- references to the log4net assembly must be set to a single assembly which
is used in all of our projects
- the us
AM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Wrapping Log4Net
awesome, can you by any chance post your ILoggerRepository implementation
(KMS.Core.Log4Net.KmsLogger) ?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Roy Chastain wrote:
> I think we have done what you want, plus a little bit. I have an
> Interface
t; This results in an output that looks like with the Full Qualified class
> name and method name inserted into the trace. In the example below, I
> have the Day, Time Threadid class name and finally my text "- Entered".
> Of couse the formatting is done via the config as nor
og4Net from the calling projects. They
still care.
--
Roy Chastain
-Original Message-
From: xalex [mailto:a...@pixafe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 1:40 AM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: RE: Wrapping Log4Net
Hi James,
yes, this works of course, but there are 2 drawbac
thanks Bruno,
i think this is exactly what i need, i will have a closer look
Alex
Bruno Baia-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Did you look at Common.Logging ?
>
> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> - Bruno
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wrapping-Log4Net-tp24551728
Hi James,
yes, this works of course, but there are 2 drawbacks: you need to request
the logger to the type for every single call. Instead of doing so, i would
like to instanciate as static variable per type only once like this:
private static readonly ILog logger = LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(Pro
Hi Daniel,
first of all, thank you for this hint.
My goal is to use my simple ILog interface (as i sketched) from the
application code and to get the logger by calling ILog logger =
LogManager.GetLogger(typeof( typeof));
I would like to get this according to the current class because I want to
c
Hi,
Despite what you have been told already I have wrapped log4net, if you
do it right it is fine imho.
I wrapped log4net since we need to consume it in scenarios where we
absoloutely cannot have a plethora of config files kicking around all
the time simply to enable some logging in the consuming
Hi,
Did you look at Common.Logging ?
http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/
- Bruno
2009/7/20 xalex
>
> Hi Peter, thanks for your reply.
>
> A - if wrapping is simply possible it offers flexibility: think of a large
> system landscape with hundrets of visual studio projects. If there is a
> chang
Hi Peter, thanks for your reply.
A - if wrapping is simply possible it offers flexibility: think of a large
system landscape with hundrets of visual studio projects. If there is a
change in the log4net version, you have to update all these references. If
it is wrapped, you can do this once (if th
Hi Alex,
> private log4net.ILog _log;
I think this line is wrong. You use an Implementation of ILog for your
wrapper. This implementation will do the same checks, your
Implementation does and it sets the locationinfo onto your position
(from the point of the _log instance, your code is doing the
he loss of loose coupling."
From: Matt Lund [mailto:ml...@control4.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 3:20 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: RE: Wrapping Log4Net
This reminds me of my attempt to wrap our use of NHibernate. I later
realized this was a bad idea for a practical reason and philo
Drier [mailto:peter.dr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 3:10 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Wrapping Log4Net
Because of "A", wrapping log4net is a bad idea. It's a noble thought,
but in 10+ years of using log4net and having people around and above me
demand wrapping, I&#
Because of "A", wrapping log4net is a bad idea. It's a noble thought, but
in 10+ years of using log4net and having people around and above me demand
wrapping, I've never seen log4net replaced. Given you can always write an
appender to output to any other system as necessary, the "need" for wrapp
ubject: Re: Wrapping Log4Net in a Facade --> incorrect LocationInfo shown for
file, methods
Ron,
Many thanks for your answer. This was exactly what I was looking for.
This is an elegant solution!
The only question I still have is the following:
The link you pointed me to (Log4NetLogger.cs)
.
However, I was just asking myself why this class only partially implemented
the interface.
Thanks again,
- José
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Grabowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4NET User"
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: Wr
Hi Jose,
if possible could you send me the Facade class for the log4net, I want to
provide same thing to the developers.
there is some property, that you can use to stop going to the levells. may be
nesting level something like this.
Thanks and regards,
Jayakumar Budamala
Citigroup Archi
I believe the pattern is called "abstract factory".
Your facade needs to perform logging using the methods on ILogger and passing
in the Type of your wrapper class. See this class for an implementation and
comments as to why its necessary:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ibatis/trunk/cs/mapper/
> -Original Message-
> From: Shireesh Thanneru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 August 2005 05:17
> To: Log4NET User
> Subject: RE: Wrapping Log4Net with a Facade - How to get the
> correct Location Information
>
> Nicko,
>
> Thanks...That worked like a
Nicko,
Thanks...That worked like a charm and now I see the actual location
information.
While we are on the facade, I have one more question. For our facade
layer, we will have some configuration information (similat to how
log4net needs its config info) that will configure our facade's
behavior.
The log4net ILog / LogImpl types are a façade (also known as wrapper or
extension) around log4net. If you are creating your own façade you need to do
the same as the LogImpl class.
Rather than calling LogManager and wrapping the ILog objects you should call
into log4net.Core.LoggerManager to ge
24 matches
Mail list logo
