> Any chance that we'll get a log4net version which is a "port" of the latest
> log4j2?
Maybe this is a discussion for the dev list, and granted I haven't looked at
what the changes are in log4j2, but my gut reaction is that a new port might be
a bad idea. Yes, log4net started as a port of
I can understand the breaking changes thing, but my impression is that straying
from the log4j design is a bad idea. What I think would be ideal is an apache
logging architecture/design and then ports to java, log4j, and .NET, log4net.
One of the big benefits I see is having "relatively" the
