Re: [log4perl-devel] OLG compliant logs

2008-04-30 Thread Merijn Broeren
tandard-not/ Cheers -- Merijn Broeren | We take risks, we know we take them. Therefore, when things | come out against us, we have no cause for complaint. | - Scott, last journal entry, march 1912 ---

Re: [log4perl-devel] Log::Log4Perl::Util::module_available broken...

2007-12-04 Thread Merijn Broeren
nd unmask the users die handlers afterwards. This is entirely safe to do and the eval will not trigger the users die handlers anymore. You can just apply the patch as is and you will not break users code. Regards, -- Merijn Broeren | We take risks, we know we take them. Therefore, when things

[log4perl-devel] Log::Log4Perl::Util::module_available broken...

2007-11-26 Thread Merijn Broeren
val { require } afterwards anyway, so you are doubling the effort. It would be very nice if you would consider to modify Log4perl to not use module_available. Or accept the RT patch. The current code does not work with @INC objects. Regards, -- Merijn Broeren | We take risks, we know we take t